Search for: "A. A. READ, Appeals Examiner"
Results 1 - 20
of 11,549
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2024, 8:55 am
A couple of recent decisions from the Virginia Court of Appeals examined the parol evidence rule and demonstrate how the rule can be applied. [read post]
24 May 2024, 5:08 am
Continue reading → [read post]
23 May 2024, 7:10 pm
Her attorneys said they plan to appeal. [read post]
23 May 2024, 11:21 am
Cir. 1985) (“The insertion of this limitation to overcome the examiner’s rejection is strong, if not conclusive, evidence of materiality. [read post]
22 May 2024, 11:21 am
Alternatively, please continue reading. [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:20 am
This allows courts to resolve ambiguities by examining the broader context and practical construction of the agreement. [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:07 am
The Board still intends to implement the Final Rule, and is expected to appeal the decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
22 May 2024, 3:00 am
So held the North Carolina Court of Appeals in State v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:17 am
That decision was affirmed on appeal. [read post]
21 May 2024, 2:45 am
It stated that the documents of the EPO examination proceedings cited by the parties shed no new light on its interpretation. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:03 pm
The notice of appeal can be accessed here. [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:25 pm
During reexamination proceedings initiated by Samsung, the patent examiner rejected the claims for ODP. [read post]
20 May 2024, 1:33 pm
President Biden, was short and reads in full as follows: "The ICC prosecutor’s application for arrest warrants against Israeli leaders is outrageous. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:06 am
In the decision on appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit found that the Bureau’s funding structure was an unconstitutional “abomination” of which the “Framers warned. [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:24 am
Today’s announcement of applications for warrants against senior Israeli officials and Hamas leaders, particularly when read in conjunction with the Expert Panel Report, is extraordinarily detailed in its specification of persons, crimes, and legal reasoning. [read post]
19 May 2024, 8:06 am
" There, the Court examined speech by a defendant used solely to solicit another to violate the law. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:37 pm
The examiner initially rejected the claims for lack of written description under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:03 am
Editor’s Note: This concise analysis of the Spring 2024 eDiscovery Business Confidence Survey critically examines the industry’s current state and future expectations. [read post]
15 May 2024, 2:18 am
Potential problems could range from questioning the validity of medical providers’ documentation to examining the circumstances surrounding workplace injuries. [read post]
15 May 2024, 2:15 am
The Applicant appealed. [read post]
