Search for: "A.D., the mother v. Department of Children and Families" Results 1 - 20 of 82
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am by Joel R. Brandes
      November 29, 2023   Appellate Division, First Department   Family Court no longer has “exclusive, continuing [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am by jonathanturley
  Police responded by taking pictures for their families. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 5:40 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Matter of Anuar S.A.O. --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 217 A.D.3d 869, 2023 WL 4095927, 2023 N.Y. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
Lengiewicz, 167 A.D.3d 608, 609, 89 N.Y.S.3d 241; Matter of Shank v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
  Police responded by taking pictures for their families. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 6:05 am by Neil Cahn
Rothschild, 60 A.D.3d 675, 875 N.Y.S.2d 155 (2nd Dept. 2009); Matter of Held v. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
Clarence N., 110 A.D.3d 430, 430–431, 972 N.Y.S.2d 245 [1st Dept. 2013]; Matter of Jose M. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
,  195 A.D.3d 402, 150 N.Y.S.3d 58 (1st Dept.,2021) ,in 2008, the biological mother was found to have neglected the child. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 7:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
  Participation of Children’s attorneys limited to matters in which children are the “subject of the proceeding” In Mahadeo v Mahadeo, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 1396138 (Mem), 2021 N.Y. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 7:07 am by Joel R. Brandes
(mother) was the mother of the five subject children – two daughters, a now-deceased daughter, and two sons. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
[Sophia M.], 179 A.D.3d at 802, quoting People v. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 4:29 am by Joel R. Brandes
Danielle B., 158 A.D.3d 767, 71 N.Y.S.3d 549 [2d Dept. 2018] and Matter of Christopher YY. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
The Probate and Family Court Department, Norfolk Division, declined to find father in contempt, found the orders constituted an unlawful restraint on speech, and issued new nondisparagement orders. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am by Joel R. Brandes
Second, recognizing that fairness also dictates that such notifications be made to the attorneys for all parties, not simply the attorneys for the children, the measure requires that, except in cases involving children freed for adoption, both notices of changes in placement and indicated child maltreatment reports be conveyed to attorneys for the birth parents. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am by Joel R. Brandes
Family Court Act § 1028-a was amended to include to include, as eligible to apply to become foster parents,  all persons who are related to children as described in social services law §458-a (3) (a), (b), or (c)   who meet Family Court Act § 1028-a requirements. [read post]