Search for: "AC v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,871
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2024, 3:32 am
However, beware, that unlike one in H-1B status who may be able to keep on applying for extensions under AC 21, the shelf life of the L-1A status is 7 years, and 5 years for the L-1B status, as AC21 does not apply to L-1s. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Secondly, the court considered that, while no previous case has directly answered the question raised by the appeal, the cases of Bulman & Dickson v Fenwick & Co [1894] 1 QB 179 and Reardon Smith Line Ltd v Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food [1963] AC 691 provided strong implicit support for MUR’s case. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:19 pm
State deficiencies in climate litigations and actions of judges Laurent Fonbaustier / Renaud Braillet 165 Part IV: Cities, States and Climate Change: Between Competition, Conflict and Cooperation Global climate governance turning translocal Delphine Misonne 181 America’s Climate Change Policy: Federalism in Action Daniel Esty 193 Local policies on climate change in a centralized State: The Example of France Camille… [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:00 am
Some examples of Schedule V drugs are: cough preparations with less than 200 milligrams of codeine or per 100 milliliters (Robitussin AC), Lomotil, Motofen, Lyrica, Parepectolinfedeerala. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:56 pm
[2] Herbert Morris Ltd v Saxelby [1916] 1 AC 688. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 am
Ormondroyd Ch was unconvinced by the justification, stating: “[20]. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am
Significantly, Linden J refers to R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL15 and R (Begum) v Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15 as the two leading Article 9 cases in this jurisdiction. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:47 pm
Scott & Anor v Scott | [1913] AC 417 | United Kingdom House of Lords | Judgment | Law | CaseMine In a lengthy footnote, the dissent parses the majority’s conclusion and citations related to divorce being open to public scrutiny. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:02 pm
This was preceded by the Court’s 2015 decision in Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 8:02 pm
The term ‘Gillick competent’ comes from the case of Gillick v West Norfolk & Wisbech Area Health Authority (1986) AC 112. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 3:38 pm
See Extreme Coatings, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
# # #DECISIONMatter of Cazzari v DiNapoli [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 5:29 pm
Barnard [1964] AC 1129. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 9:24 am
V Lions Farming, LLC v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 8:10 am
In M.C. and J.C. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Concluding that it4 TRUMP v. [read post]
Celanese v. ITC: Can a Secret Manufacturing Process Be Patented After Sale of the Resulting Product?
4 Mar 2024, 9:45 am
Auld Company v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 12:50 am
The shipowners issued bills of lading which were stated to incorporate the terms of the voyage charterparty. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:04 pm
The latest is the landmark ruling by Justice Aylen of the Federal Court in Province of Alberta et al v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm
Nothing in the post-2013 Act case law suggests that the section 3(3) requirement is any less permissive (see, for example, the first instance decision in Butt v Secretary of State [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB), and particularly Mr Justice Nicol’s comments at [39]. [read post]