Search for: "ALLEN v. DISTRICT COURT" Results 1 - 20 of 1,421
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2024, 11:21 pm by Frank Cranmer
Religion and foster care In A Health and Social Care Trust v A Mother Re (A Child) [2024] NIFam 4, the court was confronted with a dispute between the applicant Trust and the mother, an agnostic, about the placing of her child in foster care with a family of devout Pentecostal Christians – the mother arguing inter alia that this was a breach of her Article 9 rights. [read post]
” The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas held in favor of Hilcorp, but on appeal, the Fifth Circuit certified the two questions noted above to the Texas Supreme Court. [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
District Court for the Eastern District of Texas on May 2, 2024 that seeks to vacate the Final Rule and exemption amendments and enjoin the Department from enforcing, implementing, or otherwise giving them effect in any manner.3 In addition, on May 15, 2024, members of the House and Senate introduced a resolution to overturn the Final Rule pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (“CRA”).4 Nonetheless, participants in the financial services industry,… [read post]
The principle has been invoked in recent cases concerning unconstitutional congressional maps, including Allen v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 11:46 am by Yosi Yahoudai
The defendants, 23-year-old Terryonn Deshawn Pugh, 25-year-old Eric James Windom, 25-year-old Keyshawn Malik McGee, and 23-year-old Trent Allen, were charged by the Contra Costa District Attorney’s Office on a six-count felony complaint with enhancements in November 2021 (People v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts As mentioned above, on 25 April 2024, there was a statement in open court in the case of Pretty v Sabin and others QB-2022-001263. [read post]
Booz-Allen & Hamilton, Inc., 368 F. 3d 371 (4th Cir. 2004) (“significant detrimental effect”); O’Neal v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
United States The United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued its decision to grant the Center for Countering Digital Hate’s (CCDH) motion to strike out under an anti-SLAPP statute in the case of X CCDH. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
And with good reason: It does not take a tasseographer to read the tea spilled on the leaves of Justice Kavanaugh’s Allen v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 12:41 pm by Administrator
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) York Region District School Board v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 2:38 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Subsequently, on or about September 6, 2012, defendant filed a discrimination lawsuit on plaintiff’s behalf in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Allen v Chanel, Inc., et al., 12-cv-6758 (LAP). [read post]