Search for: "ALLES v. INTERSTATE POWER CO." Results 1 - 20 of 468
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2024, 7:59 am by Richard Frank
”  Specifically, the court concluded that “State Petitioners point us to no meaningful support for their novel request to apply the equal sovereignty principle as a categorical limit on Congress’s [unquestionably broad] power to regulate interstate commerce. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In two of my last three Verdict columns (this one and then this one co-authored with Jason Mazzone), I have discussed—in connection with the Supreme Court’s consideration in Trump v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 6:05 am by Stephen E. Sachs
Norfolk Southern Railway Co. and what it might mean for jurisdiction over interstate corporations. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:22 am by Peter Mahler
Unless the operating agreement otherwise provides, a member acting without the consent of all other members lacks both the power and the right to: (i) bestow membership on a non-member; or (ii) transfer to a non-member anything other than some or all of the member’s transferable interest. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 7:49 am by Dan Farber
The first case, In re Hawaii Electric Co. , involved a biomass power plant’s request to sell energy to a utility. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  All of this material adds immeasurably to understanding the workings of the Taft Court, especially the ideas and motives of the individual justices and the personal and judicial relations that existed between and among them. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Swift & Co., 323 U.S. 134, 140 (1944) (“The weight of such a judgment in a particular case will depend upon the thoroughness evident in its consideration, the validity of its reasoning, its consistency with earlier and later pronouncements, and all those factors which give it power to persuade, if lacking power to control. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
La Plata River & Cherry Creek Ditch Co. that general law, or what the Court now styled as "federal common law," still applied to some exclusively interstate or national questions. [read post]