Search for: "ANDREW v. SAMUELS et al" Results 1 - 20 of 39
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Norman L. Eisen
Complaint in Superior Court of California (March 20, 2018) Common Cause FEC Complaint re: Michael Cohen et al. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:29 am by Norman L. Eisen
Complaint in Superior Court of California (March 20, 2018) Common Cause FEC Complaint re: Michael Cohen et al. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
Andrew Restuccia and Ted Mann, “Jan. 6, 2021: How It Unfolded - A Minute-by-Minute Look,” Wall Street Journal (Feb. 12, 2021) 5. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 9:02 pm by Dan Flynn
Bishop of Mayer Brown LLP in Chicago represents the Pork Producers Council et al. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 7:35 am by Samuel Bray
[A cert petition to watch at the Supreme Court] For those who are interested in equitable remedies or the Seventh Amendment, there's an interesting cert petition by Seth Waxman et al. in TCL Communication Technology v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by John Dean
U.S. et al. are very much a part of the 2016 presidential contest. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:18 am by Podhurst Orseck
The high court in in 2012 dismissed as “improvidently granted review” First American v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm by Guest Blogger
”[1] Justice Samuel Alito pressed the polygamy issue during the Supreme Court’s oral arguments on same-sex marriage. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:01 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Attorney in the case of United States v Samuel Mullet, et al, charged members of a peculiar Amish synod with hate crimes; charges that involve far more complex proofs.About two-years ago, ole Samuel Mullet [you cannot make it up] broke away from the traditional fundamentalist Christian Amish church in which he was raised, to start a renegade sect of his own in Bergholz, Ohio. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Or what about Justices who compiled works such as those collected by Samuel Blatchford in Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Second Circuit (1852-88) (24 vols.)? [read post]