Search for: "ANTONIN SCALIA" Results 1 - 20 of 6,571
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2024, 3:04 pm by Steven Calabresi
Brennan and was joined by Justices Thurgood Marshall, Harry Blackmun, Antonin Scalia, and Anthony M. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
Caroline Cecot (George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School) has posted The Meaning of “Silence” (George Mason Law Review, Vol. 31, 2024) on SSRN. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 8:44 am
"I'm reminded of the ballsy precision of Clinton's defense as I read the NYT live reporting from Day 1 of the Hunter Biden trial:[Abbe] Lowell, Hunter Biden's lawyer... implies that the present tense of the question about drug use on the form to buy a gun — the verb “is” — means the government must prove Biden was getting high at the exact time he bought the gun.It's called the Rule of Lenity.Let me quote a SCOTUSblog piece from 2016, "The Court… [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:37 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
  Antonin Scalia used to insult his colleagues by calling their arguments "pure applesauce. [read post]
29 May 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
” To the same effect was language from a plurality opinion authored by Justice Antonin Scalia a decade earlier in 1989 in Michael H. v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
Zywicki (George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School; PERC - Property and Environment Research Center) has posted The Law and Political Economy Project: A Critical Analysis on SSRN. [read post]
27 May 2024, 9:10 am by Juan C. Antúnez
”[3] This language is quoted from what has become the seminal treatise on textualism: Antonin Scalia and Bryan Garner’s Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts. [read post]
24 May 2024, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
Nelson Lund (George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School) has posted The Fidelity of ‘Originalist’ Justices Is About to Be Tested (Originally published as an Opinion Guest Essay in The New York Times, April 9, 2024) on SSRN. [read post]
21 May 2024, 6:46 am by Marcia Coyle
The late Justice Antonin Scalia once told this reporter: “There is no relationship between the difficulty of a case and its importance. [read post]
16 May 2024, 7:46 am by Dan Farber
Putting together this list highlighted a decades-long duel between two Justices, Antonin Scalia and John Paul Stevens. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:26 am by Allan Blutstein
By JPat Brown, WhoWhatWhy, May 9, 2024In the March/April 1982 issue of Regulation, the policy periodical then published by the American Enterprise Institute, a 46-year-old University of Chicago law professor (and editor of the magazine) by the name of Antonin Scalia offered his thoughts on the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). [read post]
7 May 2024, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
Ilya Somin (George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School) has posted Brown, Democracy, and Foot Voting (American Journal of Law and Equality, Symposium on the 70th Anniversary of Brown v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
Davies (George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School; The Green Bag) has posted Casey Meets the Court (27 Green Bag 2d 169 (2024)) on SSRN. [read post]
3 May 2024, 9:46 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State at the Antonin Scalia Law School of George Mason University. [read post]
1 May 2024, 3:34 pm
Nick Harper, and Eugene Scalia, the son of the late Justice Antonin Scalia. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 3:00 am by D Daniel Sokol
Cooper George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School Emily Kral George Mason University, Antonin Scalia Law School, Students Abstract The right to “petition the government for a redress of grievances” is vital to... [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:16 pm by Mark Walsh
Sauer was a law clerk to Justice Antonin Scalia and served as solicitor general of Missouri. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
At the core of Justice Antonin Scalia’s opinion, however, was not an argument against the idea of unconscionability per se, but an argument against using “unconscionability” as a cover for a broader public policy agenda. [read post]