Search for: "APPLICATION OF HENDRICKSON"
Results 1 - 20
of 49
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
National/Federal Kevin McCarthy Uses PAC to Lavish Cash on High-End Resorts, Private Jets and Fine Dining MSN – Paul Pringle and Adam Elmahrek (Los Angeles Times) | Published: 12/7/2023 As her exits Congress two months after his historic ouster as House speaker, political obituaries tout Kevin McCarthy’s skills as a prolific fundraiser on behalf of Republican candidates. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 10:00 am
Applications should be submitted directly by email to Caitlin Hendrickson at FEMA. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
Supreme Court rejected their application for an emergency stay. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 11:36 am
Hendrickson (decided under the 14th Amendment) is the same standard as the test of objective reasonableness enunciated by the court in Graham v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal DataVault Requests US Election Agency’s Advice to Send NFTs as a Campaign Fundraising Incentive Cointelegraph – Turner Wright | Published: 10/4/2022 The legal team behind nonfungible token (NFT) firm DataVault Holdings requested an advisory opinion from the FEC on using NFTs for campaign fundraising efforts. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 11:56 am
Hendrickson applies to inadequate-care claims brought by pretrial detainees — as the U.S. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 6:27 am
Moore and other state legislators then filed an emergency application asking the U.S. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 10:04 am
Smith, which holds that laws of general applicability that burden religious exercise are not subject to strict scrutiny. [read post]
25 May 2022, 6:03 am
Application of the discovery rule in such instances eases the unconscionable result to a plaintiff who, by exercising even the highest degree of care, could not have discovered the wrongful conduct of the defendant…. [read post]
11 May 2022, 7:19 am
Hendrickson applies to inadequate-care claims brought by pretrial detainees — as the U.S. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 12:32 pm
They contend that overbroad application of the court’s older precedents essentially would “federaliz[e] much medical-malpractice litigation,” and say the court should use this case as an opportunity to clarify the proper tests for recognizing a private right of action. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 11:46 am
Hendrickson applies to inadequate-care claims brought by pretrial detainees — as the U.S. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 5:35 pm
Brennan to claims by pretrial detainees of inadequate medical care when the application of the solely objective standard in Kingsley v. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 1:11 pm
Hendrickson applies to inadequate-care claims brought by pretrial detainees — as the U.S. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
National/Federal Court Orders FEC to Rule on Complaints Against NRA’s Alleged Campaign Coordination Scheme MSN – Soo Rin Kim (ABC News) | Published: 10/1/2021 A federal court ordered the FEC to rule on pending complaints that allege the National Rifle Association (NRA) used shell entities to illegally coordinate campaign spending with federal candidates, including with the 2016 presidential campaign of Donald Trump. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 1:13 pm
This case, therefore, involves the application of "a properly stated rule of law" to a particular factual record, and our rules say that we "rarely" review such questions. [read post]
28 May 2021, 8:56 am
Hendrickson Esq (BrokeAndBroker.com Blog)http://www.brokeandbroker.... [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 5:38 am
“This was decided on a legal argument that has universal application. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 1:34 pm
Hendrickson, the Supreme Court endorsed four factors to determine whether the intentional use of force "crosse[s]" the "constitutional line": "(1) The need for the application of force; "(2) The relationship between the need and the amount of force that was used; "(3) The extent of injury inflicted; and "(4) Whether force was applied in a good faith effort to maintain or restore discipline or maliciously and sadistically for the very purpose… [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 1:34 pm
Hendrickson, the Supreme Court endorsed four factors to determine whether the intentional use of force “crosse[s]” the “constitutional line”: “(1) The need for the application of force; “(2) The relationship between the need and the amount of force that was used; “(3) The extent of injury inflicted; and “(4) Whether force was applied in a good faith effort to maintain or restore discipline or maliciously and sadistically for the very… [read post]
