Search for: "Adam v. Holder"
Results 1 - 20
of 338
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2024, 6:54 am
Holder, concerning the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:55 am
For instance in Tremblay et al. v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 1:59 pm
In Holder v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:24 pm
First, for the moment, no copyright claim has persuaded a court that licensing is required to avoid infringing the rights of copyright holders in scanned/scraped works used to train AI models.[3] And no US court has yet ruled against the argument that such use of content to train AI models is protected by fair use principles, which permit use of a protected work to create transformative new works.[4] Second, as a practical matter, the economic forces propelling the growth… [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:29 am
For example, in Atari Interactive, Inc., v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am
All rights reserved,” denoting the exclusive rights of the copyright holders, the Andy Warhol Foundation, to the image, and Campbell Soup Co. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
For present purposes, however, the important point to understand is that Trump’s primary merits argument, to which he devotes the first 13 pages of the Argument section of his brief (pp. 20-33), concerns only the second, middle “Officials Clause,” which identifies the current and former office-holders to whom Section 3 potentially applies, rather than the government positions that an insurrectionist or rebel is ineligible to occupy going forward. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 9:26 am
When Canada announced a new program for holders of U.S. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:15 am
Thus, with its order of July 11, 2023, it allowed an appeal to proceed (see case C-93/23, EUIPO v Neoperl). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:14 am
Thus, with its order of July 11, 2023, it allowed an appeal to proceed (see case C-93/23, EUIPO v Neoperl). [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:48 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:32 am
The test in Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 8:13 am
Twitter; PragerU v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 12:45 am
No litigation does not mean no problems Some SEP holders argue, as reported by Adam Houldsworth, that concerns about SEP licensing disputes were exaggerated, since most licensing contracts are closed without litigation. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:28 pm
the ‘AI’ or a copyright holder that the artwork is based on? [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:28 pm
the ‘AI’ or a copyright holder that the artwork is based on? [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 6:30 am
Lu, Sabastian V. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 6:30 am
Lu, Sabastian V. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 7:56 am
”[24] Notwithstanding these possibilities, copyrighted works in a collection cannot be freely reproduced without the rights holder’s authorization.[25] The use of AR technology for art programming may create “novel issues with respect to derivative works. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
SEC v. [read post]
