Search for: "Adams v. Reed"
Results 1 - 20
of 168
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2024, 6:48 pm
Toth v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:44 am
About the Author Adam Ziegler is a lawyer and software builder. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 7:21 am
The originators of the Caselaw Access Project: Nik Reed and Daniel Lewis, then the cofounders of Ravel Law; Adam Ziegler, then director of Harvard’s Library Innovation Lab; and Jonathan Zittrain, Harvard Law professor. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 8:50 am
Speakers include Harvard Law Professor Jonathan Zittrain; former Library Innovation law director Adam Ziegler; Ravel Law cofounders Nik Reed and Daniel Lewis; Free Law Project founder Mike Lissner; Legal Information Institute executive director Sara Frug; Angela Jaffee, account director at vLex and former national programs administrator for the Administrative Office of the United States Courts; Carl Malamud, founder of Public.Resource.Org; Harvard Law Professor Alexandra Natapoff;… [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:51 am
In Chewy v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 4:41 am
Several of Kramer’s team members, including Derron Slonecker, Joshua Scherer, and Adam Verost, followed Kramer to PWP. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 6:13 pm
In Adams Outdoor Advertising LP v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 3:45 am
Key Findings: Excessive tax rates on cigarettes induce substantial black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 2:48 am
Carolyn Pepper of Reed Smith LLP writes for the Press Gazette on the application of libel law to ‘deep fakes,’ which are digital impersonations of well-known individuals. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 9:21 pm
Her innovative case study on the Microsoft v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 4:37 pm
In Abrams v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 2:29 pm
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A Decision to Overturn Roe v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 4:58 pm
To be sure, I don't think the O'Brien precedent from the Supreme Court fully disposes of the matter, and Reed v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 1:21 am
And Kevin or Adam sort of like, Hey, I don't know. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 4:38 pm
In a case highly dependent on its very unusual facts, the Court of Appeal in Griffiths v Tickle ([2021] EWCA Civ 1882) confirmed (in dismissing an appeal) that a mother and father involved in Children Act 1989 proceedings can be identified. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm
And even if viewed as a regulation of purely commercial speech – and therefore not subject to strict scrutiny – the restriction would at least have to pass muster under the Supreme Court’s test in Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 10:25 am
Ltd v Krisenergy Ltd. [2019] explored this issue in a shipping context. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 4:00 am
In fact, as the Supreme Court opined in Reed v. [read post]
