Search for: "Alabama Power Co. v. Moore" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am by David Kopel
It helps sailors accurately cast mooring lines and other ropes. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
") After conducting the most thorough judicial review to date of relevant social science on the net public-safety effects of allowing public carriage of guns, Judge Richard Posner in Moore v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am by Chris Wesner
Moore (the “Moore Declaration”) (Doc. 4), the vice president of four of the Debtors, and the president, chief executive officer, and chief financial officer of Murray Energy Holdings Co. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm by Chris Castle
Off Shore Pirates Profit by Interfering in US Markets Unlike the historical pirates who were declared hostis humani generis under admiralty law, or the modern pirates who hijack cargo ships such as the Maersk Alabama and are stopped by Operation Allied Protector, digital pirates defy the nation state relatively openly and brazenly. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Dawson v D C Thomson & Co [2019] ScotSAC (Civ), the Sheriff Appeal Court has dismissed an appeal carer who unsuccessfully sued a local newspaper for defamation. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As the Supreme Court explained in the 1852 case of Moore v. [read post]
7 Jul 2018, 1:05 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Where as most potential Supreme Court nominees are circumspect about their views of Roe v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 4:19 am by Amy Howe
Peterson, which he describes as “a case full of twists and iron­ies that will test the powers of Con­gress, the courts, and the Ir­a­ni­an re­gime’s re­fus­al to co­oper­ate with either one. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
  Unfortunately it appears that, instead of (or perhaps in addition to, given the recent election results) the Ten Commandments, there’s another commandment that the Alabama Supreme Court is following:  Thou Shalt (if you’re an Alabamian) Recover From An Out-Of-State Drug Company.While the Alabama Supreme Court certainly has the power to abandon the notion of manufacturer liability for defects in its products (unlike a federal court sitting in… [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 3:04 am by SHG
” This conclusion was reaffirmed by the Court in District of Columbia v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm by Michael Stevens
Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 241-42, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 1711, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969)). [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm by Michael Stevens
Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 241-42, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 1711, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969)). [read post]