Search for: "Alam v Alam" Results 1 - 20 of 105
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by INFORRM
On 17 November 2023, Griffiths J hand down judgment following the trial of a preliminary issue on meaning in the case of Alam v Guardian News and Media Ltd [2023] EWHC 2847 (QB), finding that the words complained of bore meanings which were defamatory at common law and were statements of fact. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am by INFORRM
On the same day, there was a hearing of preliminary issues before Griffiths J in the case of Alam v Guardian News & Media Limited KB-2023-000955. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am by INFORRM
There was also a case management hearing before Nicklin J in the case of Daedone v BBC. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Rule, Preserving Sacred Sites and Property Law, (August 7, 2023).Mark Satta, Commercial Discrimination as Religious Messaging in 303 Creative v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 7:07 am by Clara Apt
by Mark Nevitt (@marknevitt) (February 25, 2021)  Climate Change as a National Security and Foreign Policy Priority: Opportunities and Challenges for the Next Administrationby Mayesha Alam (December 4, 2020)  Climate Change, National Security, & the New Commander-in-Chiefby Mark Nevitt (@marknevitt) (December 2, 2020)  An Age of Actorless Threats: Rethinking National Security in Light of COVID and Climateby Morgan Bazilian (@MBazilian) and Cullen Hendrix (@cullenhendrix)… [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 1:49 am by Jon L. Gelman
In reaching that conclusion, the court held that the judge failed to distinguish Ameribuilt, the corporation, from Alam, an owner and shareholder.Robert Alam v Ameribuilt Contractors, Docket A-2114-21, (N.J.App. [read post]
23 May 2022, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Siegel, Serena Mayeri & Melissa Murray, Equal Protection in Dobbs and Beyond: How States Protect Life Inside and Outside of the Abortion Context, (43 Columbia Journal of Gender and Law (2023 Forthcoming)).Michael Conklin, Buck v. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 1:46 pm
This is an otherwise routine, unanimous en banc opinion from the Ninth Circuit in an immigration case; indeed, one that was sufficiently facile that it didn't even require oral argument.Judge Bennett makes the unremarkable memorable by writing a concurrence in which he doesn't disagree with the majority in even the slightest, but instead simply wants to identify four other -- totally unrelated -- immigration cases that he also thinks should be taken en banc.Usually you wait until… [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am by Phil Dixon
Judges Inman and Griffin concurred. (1) Victim’s statements regarding identity of attacker were admissible as excited utterances despite possible passage of time between attack and statements; (2) Sixth Amendment confrontation argument not raised during trial was waived on appeal notwithstanding pretrial motion; (3) No abuse of discretion or prejudicial error in admission of testimony identifying defendant on a jail phone call and interpreting the contents of the call State v. [read post]