Search for: "All Persons v. Buie"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am
All three were supervised by prison staff. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 11:12 am
In Hudson v. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 4:29 am
It undermines the principle of “one person, one vote,” affirmed in 1964 by the Supreme Court in Reynolds v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 2:52 am
Happens all the time. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 2:52 am
Happens all the time. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:30 am
In the 1869 North Carolina case of Buie v. [read post]
15 May 2016, 10:44 pm
Buie. [read post]
17 Jan 2016, 12:25 pm
Supreme Court in Maryland v. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 11:24 pm
The Court laid it out in Morrissey v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 3:40 pm
Once again, relying on Buie, the Court explained that the justification for a protective sweep is based upon the threat posed by third persons, not the threat posed by the arrestee. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:02 am
In the unpublished case Buie v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:35 am
That case, State v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 3:05 pm
A protective sweep on conjecture there was a gun inside when the defendant was arrested outside was invalid under Buie. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 9:01 am
Buie, supra at 336; United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 7:57 am
” Payton v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 4:19 am
When the Supremes held in Maryland v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 10:30 am
In the original decision, United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 7:44 pm
But Buie says nothing at all about police who conduct an arrest outside of the home. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 6:38 am
Clearly, Buie requires more than ignorance or a constant assumption that more than one person is present in a residence. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 6:28 am
And, the fact remains that all the seized evidence was found in a place where persons could have been hiding. [read post]
