Search for: "Allen v. Commissioner of Correction" Results 1 - 20 of 78
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments Harrison v Cameron, heard 26 March 2024 (Steyn J) BW Legal Services Limited v Trustpilot,  heard 7 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Unity Plus Healthcare Limited v Clay and others,  heard 1 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Vince v Associated Newspapers, heard 19 February 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini v Dow Jones, heard 13 December 2023 (HHJ Parkes KC) Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 1 and 2… [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1]  This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) is rebuffing calls by members of Parliament to investigate a Chinese genetic research company. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:15 am by INFORRM
On 22 November 2023, the Court of Appeal (Bean, Andrew and Lewis LLJ) handed down judgment in Department for Business and Trade v Information Commissioner  [2023] EWCA Civ 1378. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:03 am by INFORRM
The Supreme Court is to decide whether the Court of Appeal was correct to strike out the claim as an abuse of process. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am by INFORRM
Greater Manchester Police are under investigation by the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) following a report of a data breach. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) issued a formal reprimand to the NHS in Lanarkshire for reportedly sharing patient data over WhatsApp. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am by INFORRM
  Research and Resources Kuczerawy, Aleksandra, Social Media Councils under the DSA: A Path to Individual Error Correction at Scale? [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) is also investigating the incident. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am by INFORRM
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) is paying greater attention to how companies use cookies on websites and how they allow users to configure their settings. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 1:21 am by INFORRM
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) is investigating. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 5:36 am by Mary Anne Peck
But with the case hanging in the balance, and the Supreme Court’s decision last year overturning Roe v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am by INFORRM
” MGN published a correction and apology to Campbell, saying: “We accept that it was entirely wrong to accuse her of having appeared on the programme to defend Jeffrey Epstein or his ‘right to rape children’ or to misquote her. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am by INFORRM
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has produced new guidance to help UX designers, product managers and software engineers embed data protection into their products and services from the creation. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am by INFORRM
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) statement can be read here. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 4:40 am by Frank Cranmer
(And see David Allen Green on The importance of giving important legislation very dull names.) [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am by INFORRM
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has begun publishing information on data breach investigations on its website. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 7:23 am by INFORRM
The Met were rebuked by the information commissioner’s office (ICO) for video surveillance of the March 2019 protest, which was attended by up to 10,000 children and young people, the Guardian reports. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection John Edwards, the Information Commissioner, has opened an investigation into concerns that the Ministry of Justice itself was unlawfully processing barristers’ personal data. [read post]