Search for: "Allen v. Unknown Party"
Results 1 - 20
of 82
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
IPSO Satisfactory Remedy – 18621-23 Booley v ok.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18524-23 Barnwell v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 18355-23 A complainant v nationalworld.com, 14 Confidential sources (2021), No breach – after investigation Satisfactory Remedy – 17293-23 Reynolds v swindonadvertiser.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18392-23 Marshall De… [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am
On 12 July 2023 there were hearings in the cases of Food Hub Limited v Persons unknown owning or controlling the Youtube account entitled ‘Fraudhub’ and Kassai v Tabarra. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 3:04 pm
Supreme Court, through an unusual coalition, has waded into the political thicket in Allen v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
On 17 May 2023, there was an application in the case of Food Hub Limited v Persons Unknown. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 2:40 am
The article responds to the recent decision of Abbasi & ors v Newcastle NHS Trust & ors. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am
On the same day Ritchie J handed down judgment in the case of Armstrong Watson LLP v Persons Unknown [2023] EWHC 762 (KB) setting out his reasons for granting a without notice injunction at a private hearing in a case where the claimant law firm had been subject to a hack of its IT systems and a subsequent blackmail attempt. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am
On the same day, there were hearings in the cases of 2 Wakefield Limited v Persons Unknown, Clarke v Rose and Wolverhampton City Council v Kevin Poole. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am
Held, both RoR1 and RoR2, and all three snippets, on google.com.au were defamatory and were published by inference to unknown third parties; there was no sufficient evidence that RoR1 or RoR2 were accessed on google.com in Australia and hence it cannot be accepted on the balance of probabilities that they were published in Australia; Google is proven to have participated in the communication of RoR1 and RoR2 in Australia on google.com.au so as to render it liable as a secondary… [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
The plaintiff “attended a Christmas party at her place of employment and then visited two bars. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 7:23 am
EdTech businesses work in a fast-paced, relatively unregulated environment and their cybersecurity measures remain largely unknown. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:12 am
Mr Justice Saini found the article carried the meaning that Ware was a “rogue journalist who had engaged in dirty tricks aimed at harming the Labour Party’s chances of winning the General Election by authoring and presenting an edition of Panorama in which he presented a biased and knowingly false presentation of the extent and nature of anti-Semitism within the party, deliberately ignoring contrary evidence”. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 4:10 pm
ABC is seeking to rely on a new public interest defence in a defamation battle with former elite soldier and Australian Values Party founder Heston Russell, who claims the broadcaster wrongly accused him of war crimes. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:12 pm
Newspapers Journalism and Regulation On 5 September 2022, Hacked Off research revealed the extent of press bias in Conservative Party-supporting newspapers during the race to become PM. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm
Hacked Off had an article explaining why it is not in the interests of the public or the freedom of the press to repeal section 40 of the Crime and Courts Act 2015, following Conservative MP and candidate for Leader of the Conservative Party and Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s pledge to do so. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:22 am
On 12 and 13 July 2022 Jay J heard the case of Hodson v Persons Unknown & Others. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm
The All-Party Parliamentary Group on Media Literacy has called for a new Media Literacy Education Bill. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Supreme Court overturn Roe v. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 4:26 pm
In reasserting his conclusion from Warren, Saini J confirmed that the relevant conduct in claims of this nature is the criminal third-party actors, not the misuse of private information by the defendants [49]. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:08 pm
On 18 May 2022, the actor and Reclaim Party founder Laurence Fox’s application for a trial by jury in his ongoing defamation litigation was refused by Nicklin J (Blake & Ors v Fox (Re Trial by Jury) [2022] EWHC 1124 (QB)). [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm
On the same day Steyn J heard an application in the case of Ince Group v Persons Unknown On 27 April 2022 Nicklin J heard a mode of trial application in the case of Blake v Fox. [read post]
