Search for: "American Association of Foundations for Medical Care v. Federal Trade Commission" Results 1 - 20 of 43
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2022, 5:04 pm
 The  Congressional-Executive Commission on China (CECC), issued today the Commission’s 2022 Annual Report on human rights conditions and rule of law developments in the People’s Republic of China (PRC). [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 7:59 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division (EEOC v. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 9:03 pm by Alana Sheppard
” Walters highlighted that in Gundy v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am by William Ford, Victoria Gallegos
The committee will hear testimony from Luis Almagro, secretary general of the Organization of American States; Deborah Ulmer, regional director for Latin America and the Caribbean at the National Democratic Institute; and Ryan Berg, fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Any proposal to reform the tax treatment of parents with dependents should consider the credit’s temporarily-expanded status under the TCJA, policy design trade-offs, and interaction with other credits and deductions. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 1:28 pm by Robert Liles
  As the GAO noted, there was no scientific basis for these claims.[4]   As a result of the GAO’s findings, in 2006 the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), in conjunction with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued consumer alerts warning the public to be wary of the claims being made by many of these genetic testing companies. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 7:05 pm
  Even as President Xi was celebrating the Sino-Russian Joint Statement, he was careful to suggest that China was seeking a comprehensive decoupling of the U.S. and Chinese economies--at this time (China, US too intertwined to ‘break up’ despite trade war, Xi Jinping says in Russia). [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am by msatta
Actavis[18] and concurring in California Dental Association v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 7:01 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
One of the most frequently violated and litigated federal employment laws, the FLSA generally requires that U.S. employers pay nonexempt employees at least $7.25 per hour for all regular compensable hours worked, plus time and one-half their regular rates, including commissions, bonuses and incentive pay, for hours worked beyond 40 per week. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 4:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Last year, the American Bar Association reported in its annual Legal Technology Survey that one in four firms with at least 100 attorneys have experienced data breaches involving hackers, website attacks or stolen or lost smartphones, tablets or laptop computers. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 2:10 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The FLSA requires that covered, non-exempt employees be paid at least the federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour for all hours worked, plus time and one-half their regular rates, including commissions, bonuses and incentive pay, for hours worked beyond 40 per week. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 7:52 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  The EEOC says Magnolia’s prohibited discriminatory practices included only offering positions to certain applicants under the condition that the applicants pass a medical examination, as well as discharging or revoking job offers when it learned of or received records of prior medical conditions or current medical restrictions. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:43 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The FLSA currently requires that covered employees be paid at least the federal minimum wage of $7.25 for all hours worked, plus time and one-half their regular rates, including commissions, bonuses and incentive pay, for hours worked beyond 40 per week. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 3:29 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employers using or considering using health risk assessments or other wellness programs should carefully monitor a new Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) lawsuit, EEOC v. [read post]