Search for: "American Etc. v. Harbor Etc." Results 1 - 20 of 95
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2024, 1:10 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
SHOP SAFE would impose contributory liability with [RT: impossible to comply with] safe harbors. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:51 pm by Scott McKeown
Let’s start off with what I consider to be the “good” proposals: The Good 314(a) – Codify Apple v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 5:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
How do you measure the risk of freedom of expression v. copyright takedowns? [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
The Rule 506 safe harbor provides insulation from state blue sky laws and, as I’ve mentioned, from the registration provisions of the federal securities laws. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 1:11 pm by Alan S. Kaplinsky
Hopefully, however, part of that process, Congress might very well overturn some of the numerous opinions, circulars, policy statements, etc. which are not full-blown regs. [read post]
But absent a major change between now and 2025, there are going to be significant changes with regard to drug pricing, ACA coverage and the Medicare program which will affect millions of Americans and most of the healthcare industry. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 10:57 am by Michael Ehline
Posted on Car Accident Law Blog / Blog / Ultimate Guide to NHTSA v IIHS Testing Ratings Efforts to guarantee passenger safety and improve vehicle standards have given birth to two main authorities in safety performance testing, which are: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) Each of these independent vehicle safety bodies is responsible for conducting a new car assessment program on vehicles about to enter the market using… [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:06 am by Chile Eboe-Osuji
The danger comes from the cognitive distortion that the world has seen in American politics in the manner of the “Big Lie” technique. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 11:47 am by Sherry F. Colb
Remember learning at oral argument in Dobbs v. [read post]