Search for: "Ames vs. Miller" Results 1 - 20 of 78
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
At the same time, the conversation has diversified: more voices, more perspectives, and more issues beyond the militia vs. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 10:23 am by David Kopel
A Little More Saul Cornell, National Review Online, May 25, 2022, 9:53 AM: Saul Cornell, who is a professor of history when he is not writing for Slate, is engaged in intellectual dishonesty. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 9:42 am by SteveDowney
Open Sunday to Saturday 11 am to 9 pm. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm by Jason Rantanen
Figure 1: Percentage of Patent Litigations Including a Pre-AIA Patent, by Year Litigation Initiated Figure 2: 2021 Pending Patent Applications Pre- vs. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm by Jason Rantanen
Figure 1: Percentage of Patent Litigations Including a Pre-AIA Patent, by Year Litigation Initiated Figure 2: 2021 Pending Patent Applications Pre- vs. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 11:09 pm by Bill Marler
She discussed the CT differential diagnoses of inflammatory vs. infectious colitis with the on-call gastroenterologist, who recommended starting antibiotics if Carolyn spiked a fever or had worsening pain. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
  --Dan ErnstWednesday, November 20, 20199:00 AM – 4:00 PMWhat is a Legal Archive? [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
 Anne Kornhauser (imperial law): Coetzee’s Waiting for the BarbariansDaniel LaChance (@dwlachance): Susan Glaspell’s short story “A Jury of Her Peers” has worked well in my survey.Elizabeth Lhost (@elizainlucknow): I had students read Kafka's The Trial at the beginning of the semester and then used it in later weeks to address different ideas about law—expectations, experiences, role of experts, presumed guilt vs. presumed [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
(Of course I am not suggesting here that Roe does represent an egregious error, only that members of the Casey majority indicated that egregious error would not be enough to justify overturning past precedent.)It is not entirely clear that a majority of justices still embrace that idea expressed in Casey. [read post]