Search for: "Anderson v. Bradley"
Results 1 - 20
of 69
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2024, 8:00 am
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed suit (EEOC v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 8:00 am
District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief.In addition to paying $50,000 to the impacted individual, the company has agreed to modify its employment related policies and practices and will provide appropriate in-person sexual harassment training to its employees, managers, and human resources personnel.In a written statement,EEOC Birmingham district director Bradley Anderson, noted that, “In short, sexual harassment is… [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:00 am
”)Believing that such conduct violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (Title VII), the EEOC filed suit (EEOC v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 7:00 am
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed suit (EEOC v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Trump v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 7:00 am
District Court for the Northern District of Alabama,In addition to the monetary settlement, the companies have agreed to revise their training and employment practices and will educate their employees about their rights (and responsibilities) under federal law.In a written statement, EEOC Birmingham District Director Bradley Anderson, noted that, “Under Title VII, employers must provide a workplace free from severe or pervasive sexual harassment …. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 7:00 am
District Court for the Northern District of Alabama,In addition to the monetary settlement, the companies have agreed to revise their training and employment practices and will educate their employees about their rights (and responsibilities) under federal law.In a written statement, EEOC Birmingham District Director Bradley Anderson, noted that, “Under Title VII, employers must provide a workplace free from severe or pervasive sexual harassment …. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 7:00 am
And shall advise all employees of their rights under federal law.In a written statement, EEOC Birmingham District Director Bradley Anderson, noted that “Requiring individuals during the hiring process to answer invasive questions about medical conditions of their grandparents, parents or children violates GINA …. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 8:00 am
District Court for the Northern District of Florida, Pensacola Division, seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief.In a written statement, EEOC Birmingham District Director Bradley Anderson, noted that “Federal law requires employers to accommodate sincerely held religious beliefs if reasonable accommodation can be made without causing undue burden to the business. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 8:00 am
In addition to compensating the employee, the company has agreed to modify its polices and practices to ensure compliance with the law.In a written statement, Bradley Anderson, district director of EEOC’s Birmingham office, observed, “An employer has a duty to protect its employees from a hostile environment of frequent or serious sexual harassment when it knows of the ongoing harassment ….It is an unacceptable and unlawful practice to ignore complaints and… [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 8:00 am
”Because such conduct allegedly violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the EEOC file suit (EEOC v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 8:00 am
District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, seeking back pay, compensatory and punitive damages, together with injunctive relief preventing the recurrence of such misconduct.In a written statement, EEOC Birmingham District Director Bradley Anderson noted, “One would hope that a healing facility would have the understanding and compassion to honor a reasonable accommodation for an injury that was suffered at its own workplace …. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:41 am
Blakely v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:45 pm
Curtis Bradley and Jack Goldsmith concluded their three-part analysis of Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 2:25 pm
Curtis Bradley and Jack Goldsmith examined the legal efficacy of the U.S. government prosecuting entities owned by foreign states, in the context of Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 1:25 pm
Anderson to discuss the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals Dec. 1 ruling in Trump v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:28 pm
Gallo v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
In 1873, in Bradwell v. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 6:01 am
Peter Margulies explained the Supreme Court’s decision in Biden v. [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 7:52 am
Matthew Kahn analyzed the Supreme Court’s oral arguments in Van Buren v. [read post]
