Search for: "Aplin v. Aplin"
Results 1 - 20
of 26
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2024, 1:15 am
Aplin LJ and Nugee LJ allowed the appeal, with Bean LJ dissenting. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 7:56 am
ARTECHOUSE, New York; Picture Courtesy of Atreya MathurBy Kelsey Clifford Art is a consistent escape from reality. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 2:13 pm
Image: Devon D'EwartPart V: Copyright Exceptions and TechnologyThis final part, consists of only one chapter, which is a shame as such an interesting topic could have benefited from further perspectives. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 10:29 am
Tanya Aplin & Lionel Bently, Global Mandatory Fair Use, AU Book Talk. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 11:04 am
Enrico Bonadio, Protecting Art in the Street (Dokument Press 2020)Jane Ginsburg, Deep Dive: Burrow-Giles Lithographing v. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 10:55 am
Turning to functionality, Arnold provides a detailed account of the law from Navitaire v EasyJet, Nova v Mazooma and of course SAS v WPL. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 12:08 pm
Aplin, S.L. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 4:06 pm
This is very similar to the approach adopted by the High Court of this Jurisdiction in NT1 v Google and in Ireland in Townsend v Google under the pre-GDPR data protection legislation. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 5:07 am
The other day, this Kat heard Professor Lionel Bentley talking about his recent research with Professor Tanya Aplin looking at the scope of the Quotation exception. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:13 pm
Unfortunately, that case law is notoriously unclear as to the Court’s justification for doing so – and, as Tanya Aplin and Jason Bosland observe, this ‘makes it difficult to predict when matters of reputation engage Article 8’. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 5:11 am
Tania Aplin of KCL. [read post]
2 Apr 2016, 4:43 pm
Although the Court’s case law has not been entirely consistent (see T Aplin and J Bosland, “The Uncertain Landscape of Article 8 of the ECHR: The Protection of Reputation as a Fundamental Human Right? [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 4:04 pm
A reserved judgment is awaited in the fourth, Sobrinho v Impressa Publishing, heard on 7 to 9 December 2015 by Dingemans J. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:24 am
, Tanya Aplin and Jason John Bosland, King’s College London and University of Melbourne Next week in the courts The trial in Yeo v Times Newspapers will continue on 19 and 20 October 2015. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 4:13 pm
Research and Resources Delfi v Estonia: ISPs and the freedom to impart information, Christina Angelopoulos, IPKat Blog Commercialising Privacy and Privatising the Commercial: The Difficulties Arising from the Protection of Privacy via Breach of Confidence, A Kur, N Lee, A Ohly and G Westkamp (eds), Intellectual Property, Unfair Competition and Publicity – Convergence and Development EIPIN Series Vol II (Edward Elgar, 2014), Tanya… [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 1:55 pm
., Plaintiff, v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 11:15 am
., Plaintiff, v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 6:48 pm
Aplin v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 7:16 am
As explained by Cornish, Llewelyn and Aplin, to fall within section 30 CDPA exception, it is required that (1) the event itself is current (so no extracts from football matches that took place years ago); and (2) the dealing is fair. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 2:24 am
The right of integrity under UK law draws upon Article 6bis of the Berne Convention, but - according to Cornish, Llewelyn and Aplin, is even in "apparently narrower terms”. [read post]
