Search for: "Appel v. DEPT. OF STATE HIGHWAYS"
Results 1 - 20
of 51
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2024, 7:50 am
InFederman v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 11:55 am
State of California, Dept. of Motor Vehicles (June 22, 2023) (“Nunes I”) 88 Cal. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 11:30 am
Nunnally v Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Windsor, 2023 WL 4219046 (NYAD 2 Dept. 6/28/2023) [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 4:28 pm
The Appellate Division, quoting Lerner Pavlick Realty v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
Robert Genis, for appellant. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
Robert Genis, for appellant. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:41 am
https://casetext.com/case/evergreen-v-charlotte-cty-bd Further, the circuit court may not enter injunctions or damages. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 10:38 pm
One of the only notable valuation rulings I’ve encountered is Vick v Albert, 47 AD2d 482 [1st Dept 2008], a case I previously wrote about here. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm
This paper presents a survey of federal and state court decisions on these two questions, hoping to offer some guidance to practitioners. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
” This modified the old rules and constitutional application in which the jury or commissioners were judges of the law and the facts. 10 In re Public Highway in Elba Twp, 236 Mich 282, 284; 210 NW 297 (1926). 11 A precise discussion of the changes in the constitution appears in State Hwy Comm v Vanderkloot, 392 Mich 159, 169-176, 191; 220 NW2d 416 (1974). [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 8:56 am
White Plains Rural Cemetery Association v City of White Plains, 2019 WL 362123 (NYAD 2 Dept. 1/30/2019). [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 8:53 am
Route 17k Real Estate, LLC v Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Newburgh, 2019 WL 362126 (NYAD 2 Dept. 1/30/2019). [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:41 am
Dept of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, No. 2017-CA002318 (Fla. 4th Cir. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 8:35 am
A Washington appellate court ruled in 2013, in Nielsen v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 7:32 am
In Estevez v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 8:30 am
Ohio State Highway Patrol, from the 12th appellate district,which at the time was pertinent authority. [read post]
