Search for: "Appellate Defender v Engel" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
David Strauss is the Gerald Ratner Distinguished Service Professor of Law and Faculty Director of the Jenner & Block Supreme Court and Appellate Clinic at the University of Chicago Law School. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Wells v DeMarco, 2018 NY Slip Op 07740, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentSusai Francis, an Indian national living on Long Island, had overstayed his visa. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 3:47 am by Peter Mahler
“A fiduciary may breach his duties by exercising his contractual rights in an unfair or inequitable manner” (citing Lacher v Engel, 33 AD3d 10 [1st Dept 2006]). [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
  And therein hangs the tale of today’s case, Eckler and Engel v. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 11:31 am
  When counsel were finally forced to respond after defendants instituted Rule 11 proceedings, what they said was “incomplete or conflicting on nearly every relevant point. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 5:15 am by Anita Davies
The scope of art 6 rights have proved a problematic issue for the European Court of Human Rights in its jurisprudence, and a considerable body of case law has been required to clarify and define the terms ‘charge’ and ‘criminal’ under art 6 (see Engel v. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 10:45 am
App. 3d 607 (1st Dist. 1985) (holding that the dangers associated with train flipping are not open and obvious to children and the defendants had a duty to repair holes in fences surrounding the trains) and Engel v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 4:35 am by Ray Mullman
Dechert's website had the following about their recent win in a lawsuit against Fundamental: Dechert attorneys obtained a favorable judgment issued on Feb. 7 by the First Department of the New York Appellate Division in Fundamental Long Term Care Holdings LLC v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 12:30 am by Daniel Sokol
The case of Engel v The Netherlands (no. 1) (1976) 1 EHRR 647 put forward three factors when deciding whether or not a person is charged with a criminal offence: The classification of the proceedings under national law (i.e., whether they are classed as civil or criminal proceedings); The ‘essential’ nature of the proceedings; The penalty that the applicant risks incurring. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 11:21 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  The appellate court also noted that Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 402(a) allows for an individual to be served by handing a copy to the defendant or by handing a copy at any usual place of business of the defendant. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
CASSIDY BLIX STREET RECORDS, INC., Plaintiff, Cross-Defendant, and Appellant, v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
CASSIDY BLIX STREET RECORDS, INC., Plaintiff, Cross-Defendant, and Appellant, v. [read post]