Search for: "Application of Gault" Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2023, 3:10 pm by Maria Hook
Gault J considered that it was the plaintiff, Kea, that had to show a plausible evidential basis here. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 4:38 pm by Maria Hook
Gault J considered that the case was “very unusual” (at [68]). [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 9:13 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
These include In re Gault, which extended Gideon to civil juvenile delinquency proceedings, and Lassiter v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 2:29 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Pennsylvania, a series of decisions by the United States Supreme Court, most notably the decision In re Gault, inaugurated sweeping constitutional reforms of the rights of juveniles in this country as seen in In re Dennis M. and Matter of Benjamin L. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 8:23 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In Gault, the court decided that due process and fair treatment require that the juveniles be granted certain rights that are available to all adults. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 1:09 pm by Terry Lenamon
Supreme Court would take review of a number of other right to counsel situations, and continue widening its application to (1) children in juvenile delinquency proceedings (In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967))and (2) indigent defendants facing misdemeanor charges in state courts that involved possible loss of freedom (jail time) (Argersinger v. [read post]
19 Feb 2025, 8:26 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
LEXIS 114 (Appeals Board noteworthy panel decision)) “Complexity of Medical Treatment” (See Gault Americana Vacation Clubs, Inc., Republic , 2018 Cal. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 9:19 am by Jacquelyn Greene
These changes reflected the evolving jurisprudence of the United States Supreme Court, which acknowledged a range of due process rights for juveniles in delinquency proceedings beginning with the landmark decision in In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967). [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:30 am by MBettman
In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967) (“[d]ue process of law is the primary and indispensable foundation of individual freedom. [read post]
3 Jun 2007, 2:35 pm
DIVERSION--An alternative to trial decided upon at intake to refer the child to counseling or other social services; applicable to about 50% of all cases. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 8:26 am by MBettman
”) In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967) (“[N]either the Fourteenth Amendment nor the Bill of Rights is for adults alone. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 8:23 am by MBettman
In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967) (“[N]either the Fourteenth Amendment nor the Bill of Rights is for adults alone. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
The main work of the Court currently appears to be in dealing with leave applications. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 7:08 am by MBettman
Davidson, 79 Ohio St.3d 116, 121 (1997) (Plain error review as applied to civil cases is disfavored, and must be limited to “extremely rare cases where exceptional circumstances require its application to prevent a manifest miscarriage of justice, and where the error complained of, if left uncorrected, would have a material adverse effect on the character of, and public confidence in, judicial proceedings. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
The trial court denied the motion, holdingthat application of the new statute after years of discovery under pre-existingrules governing expert witnesses would violate the Georgia Constitution’sproscription against retroactive laws. [read post]