Search for: "Application of Interstate Power Co." Results 1 - 20 of 310
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2024, 6:45 am by Evangelina Cantu
The automobile manufacturer and energy company intervenors that supported the waiver included Ford Motor Company, Volkswagen Group of America, BMW of North America, American Honda Motor Co., Volvo Car USA, the National Coalition for Advanced Transportation, Advanced Energy Economy, Calpine Corporation, National Grid USA, the New York Power Authority, and the Power Companies Climate Coalition. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 7:59 am by Richard Frank
”  Specifically, the court concluded that “State Petitioners point us to no meaningful support for their novel request to apply the equal sovereignty principle as a categorical limit on Congress’s [unquestionably broad] power to regulate interstate commerce. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In two of my last three Verdict columns (this one and then this one co-authored with Jason Mazzone), I have discussed—in connection with the Supreme Court’s consideration in Trump v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
Because theCTA exceeds the Constitution’s limits on the legislative branch and lacks a sufficientnexus to any enumerated power to be a necessary or proper means of achievingCongress’ policy goals, the Plaintiffs are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  It explores that enduring subject by focusing on issues involving intergovernmental tax immunity, congressional regulatory power, the dormant Commerce Clause, and the law-making authority of the federal judiciary. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Swift & Co., 323 U.S. 134, 140 (1944) (“The weight of such a judgment in a particular case will depend upon the thoroughness evident in its consideration, the validity of its reasoning, its consistency with earlier and later pronouncements, and all those factors which give it power to persuade, if lacking power to control. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:48 pm by Daphne Keller
Platforms’ initial pleadings raised three big claims based on (1) the First Amendment, (2) Section 230, and (3) the “Dormant” Commerce Clause, which sometimes limits states’ ability to regulate issues affecting interstate commerce. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
La Plata River & Cherry Creek Ditch Co. that general law, or what the Court now styled as "federal common law," still applied to some exclusively interstate or national questions. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 10:21 pm by Jim Lindgren
They devoted the third section of their amicus brief to critiquing an amicus brief that I co-filed in Moore arguing against congressional power to impose a wealth tax or to tax unrealized capital gains – a brief which was joined by former Attorney General Edwin Meese III and by Professor Gary Lawson. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 7:31 pm by Sean Hayes
For a basic understanding of Korean Interstate Succession Law and Korean Inheritance Law see: Korean Inheritance Law and Korean Inheritance Tax Law The post provides a basic explanation of what families are entitled to inherit under Korean Law and the applicable Korean Inhertitance Taxes. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 7:42 am by Eric Goldman
He initially suspected that Snapchat would be exempt until he read a news report quoting one of Act 689’s co-sponsors who claimed Snapchat was specifically targeted for regulation. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 7:50 am by Evan George
The problem here is the Federal Power Act, which leaves transmission siting authority with the states. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
This past Term also produced a pair of decisions addressing the presumption against extraterritorial application of federal statutes, a doctrine which continues to provide an often powerful defense for corporations confronting federal claims. [read post]