Search for: "Application of Nebraska Public Power Dist."
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
Of six alternatives evaluated in the draft, including the no-action alternative, the agency identified Alternative 3 as the preferred alternative which would make approximately 22 million acres of public lands within 10 miles of existing and planned transmission lines over 100 kilovolts available for solar applications (unless otherwise excluded based on the resource-based exclusion criteria identified in the EIS). [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
Id. at 8 (citing Tarrant Regional Water Dist. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
Not that the barque twists and turns of the application of the doctrine has not served the interests of judicial majorities of the Supreme Court when it suited them--even as a means of protecting the populace form religious expression that might not represent the views of a majority. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am
See Nebraska Press Ass’n, sup [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
First, it recognizes the power of the government to take private property for public use. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
New York,3 that the Supreme Court matter-of-factly held that the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment was “of course” applicable to the states.4 To justify incorporation, Penn Central cited only one 19th century case, which itself did not mention the Fifth Amendment.5 Before Penn Central, the Court relied on the Due Process Clause to restrict the scope of state taking power. [read post]
16 Apr 2017, 12:11 pm
Plaintiff Shane Harrington sought a location for an adult entertainment venue in Seward County, Nebraska. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 7:16 am
Among other things, the department regularly reviews LPL’s agents’ advertisements and other public statements for compliance with applicable rules. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 9:25 am
Dist. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 6:36 am
” Tarrant Regional Water Dist., 569 U. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:33 pm
By approving Proposal 2 and thereby amending their state constitution, Michigan voters exercised their privilege to enact laws as a basic exercise of their democratic power, bypassing public officials they deemed not responsive to their concerns about a policy of granting race-based preferences. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 4:51 am
In a footnote, the majority noted that because the plaintiffs’ challenge is limited to public education, the court’s ruling did not determine whether the portions of Proposal 2 that affect public employment and public contracting also violate the Equal Protection Clause. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
The bankruptcy court held that the discovery documents at issue could be disclosed to the public, because the public's interest in disclosure of these discovery documents outweighed the priests' privacy interest under Rule 26(c) and that the documents filed in court could be disclosed because they did not contain "scandalous" allegations for purposes of 11 U.S.C. 107(b). [read post]
