Search for: "Application of Peter Andrews (3 Cases)"
Results 1 - 20
of 305
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2022, 11:00 pm
This is all the more surprising as Article L. 614-9 of the same Code, which lists the rights arising from the application, does not mention Article L. 615-3. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 4:34 am
In a highly principled matter, the Danish Maritime and Commercial High Court has ruled to dismiss Novartis’ application for a preliminary injunction against Glenmark, Zentiva, and Viatris based on the patent application EP 2 959 894 (the “894-application”). [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 9:10 am
Data based on a snapshot from the Unified Patent Court Case Management System taken at 23:09 CET on 3 March 2023. [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 11:55 pm
In this case, it was a confirmation of a decision of the INPI to reject a SPC application for nivolumab, an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody. [read post]
24 Sep 2024, 11:08 pm
This is the second rejection of a PI application in relation with biosimilars by UPC local division, following that of the Hamburg one in March 2024 in the case opposing Alexion to Amgen and Samsung Bioepsis (eculizumab, Soliris®, see here). [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 12:44 pm
Regardless of the degree to which one agrees or disagrees with this proposal (for discussion see Peter Mankowski, Recht der Internationalen Wirtschaft [RIW] 2018, 488; Andrew Dickinson, IPRax 2018, 337; Michael F. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 1:42 am
The scrutiny of S. 3(e) in the present case also sheds light on the standards required to be met for its applicability to composition claims. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 4:50 pm
Today, Andrew Boortz of Reed Smith provides some insight on the site, which highlights whenever anyone uses a location-based web application to 'check in' someplace, therefore letting everyone know that they are no longer at home. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 1:02 pm
The local division in Paris has had 19 cases (7 infringement, 11 counterclaim for revocation, 1 application for preserving evidence), followed by Düsseldorf (18 cases), Mannheim (11 cases) and Hamburg (8 cases). [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 10:29 am
This post explores that potential broader application. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 2:40 pm
More from our authors: Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention 2022 Edition by Kaisa Suominen, Peter de Lange, Andrew Rudge€ 105 Guide to EU and UK Pharmaceutical Regulatory Law, Eighth Edition by Sally Shorthose€ 265 The Digital Economy and International Trade: Transnational Data… [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 1:13 pm
City of Fargo, Case No. 3:22-cv-183. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 7:40 am
615-3 and R. 615-3 of FIPC), and which may also be appealed to the Court of Appeal. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 4:58 pm
This case reflects an important application of the right to be forgotten under article 8 of the Convention. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 4:02 pm
There five published “resolved complaints”: Andrew Newman v Daily Mail (clause 1), Morag Powell v Scotsman (clauses 1 and 3), Bryony Hill v Mail on Sunday (clauses 1, 3 and 4), Sean McGrath v Herald (Glasgow) (clause 1) and Peter Jones v Daily Telegraph (clause 1). [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 3:19 am
The Court concluded that in this case the applicant had acted with sufficient urgency in seeking the PI, but this will depend on the facts in each case. [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 4:12 am
As this defense is so new, the decision (4c O 18/21) by the Regional Court of Düsseldorf, which has just been released for publication and is the first one in a pharma case where Sec. 139(1) clause 3 has been invoked, might be of particular interest to patent practitioners. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 1:43 am
French case law contains numerous examples of the application of the notion of plausibility. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:14 am
More from our authors: Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention 2023 Edition by Kaisa Suominen, Nina Ferara, Peter de Lange, Andrew Rudge€ 105 Artificial Intelligence and Patents: An International Perspective on Patenting AI-Related Inventions by Jonathan P. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 10:16 am
§ 106(3); Peter S. [read post]