Search for: "Arch v. Arch"
Results 1 - 20
of 584
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2024, 5:00 am
In the wake of the announced boycott against Columbia University, I posed several questions to Judge Matthew Solomson of the U.S. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 am
…From my assessment the pulpit would not impinge greatly on the area available for the choir to stand to the west of the chancel arch. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
To give the reader some idea of the artificial flavor of Egilman’s pomposity, paragraph 8 of his remarkable declaration avers” “My views on the scientific standards for the determination of cause-effect relationships (medical epistemology) have been cited by the Massachusetts Supreme Court (Vassallo v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 1:06 am
Had this case come before the court today (or even a few years later), there would be a much different outcome with a vast rusting arch bifurcating the Plaza in Manhattan. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 12:38 am
The ECtHR Declines to Intervene on Religious Slaughter: on Executief van de Moslims van België and Others v Belgium [2024] ECHR 137, which we noted here. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 1:38 am
Its nave and apse have since been converted into a 200-seat auditorium for lectures, events and performances, with its original pulpit, arches and wooden roof trusses preserved. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 2:21 am
Applying the Duffield questions and the judgment of Re St John the Baptist, Penshurst [2015] PTSR D40 (at 21 and 22) as set out the guidance of the Court of Arches, the Chancellor concluded: “[24]. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
For the Balkinization symposium on Robert Post, The Taft Court: Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921–1930 (Cambridge University Press, 2024).Robert Post Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., who devised the funds (symbolically) supporting the volume discussed in this symposium, lived most of his life in the shadow of his rock star father, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Brandeis’s dissent in Olmstead v. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 12:05 am
Quick links Mateusz Wąsik, Strasbourg Observers: Przybyszewska and Others v. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 6:45 am
” Wolston v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 2:15 am
Review of the ecclesiastical court judgments during November 2023 Eleven consistory court judgments were circulated in November and relate to reordering, exhumation, and churchyards. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 1:41 pm
Ford Motor Co., which was embraced sub silentio by the Delaware Chancery Court in eBay Domestic Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:21 am
So this was different from the troop of Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor, looting during the 16th century. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 7:00 am
Arch Fellow North LLC d/b/a McDonald’s, Civil Action No. 6:23-cv-00331) in the U.S. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 6:51 am
In Vizio Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 12:54 am
Mary’s is Grade I listed building, the proper approach was to address the “Duffield questions”, i.e the guidelines set out by the Court of the Arches in Re St. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 1:28 pm
“The facts of Clear Spring Property and Casualty Company v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Sherry was a genuinely compassionate person and a patient teacher in her classes, but she could turn arch or even angry when confronting what she regarded as unfairness or other bad behavior. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 2:20 am
The CBC guidance notes on net zero emissions are clearly the result of detailed technical consideration of the issues involved, but without external verification, to mis-quote Bullimore Ch, “make the Guidance notes a very different sort of animal [from the “statutory guidance”] considered in Regina (Munjaz) v Mersey Care NHS Trust [2006] 2 AC 148]. [read post]
