Search for: "Argue v. Argue " Results 1 - 20 of 121,090
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2024, 6:50 pm by Thomas B. Griffith
Sargent, No. 23-3005, by arguing Sentencing Guidelines commentary is not entitled to deference under Kisor v. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am by familoo
Cases where a party argues for no involvement at all (no indirect contact, no grant of PR / termination of it) are still few and far between – although I wonder if in recent years more parents observing a shift in attitudes towards domestic abuse have been emboldened to argue for no contact to abusive parents and removal or restriction of their PR[7]? [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 11:43 am by Steve Bainbridge
The amendment is designed to overturn VC Laster's recent decision in West Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 10:12 am by Katitza Rodriguez
EFF has consistently argued that the Convention should be limited to core or cyber-dependent crimes—offenses in which computer systems are the direct objects and instruments, crimes which could not exist without information and communications technology (ICT) systems. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 7:51 am by David Bernstein
Here is the abstract: In this Essay, prepared for a symposium honoring Brown v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 7:30 am by Neil Siegel
One main reason that the Constitution is too difficult to amend, Chapter 10 argues, is that Article V essentially lets states vote twice. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 5:57 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Plaintiff tries to argue he was singled out for disparate treatment, but the Court of Appeals finds his "comparators" are not really comparators.The case is Carter v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 5:11 am by Michael Oykhman
Examples of acts which have, in the past, met the actus reus standard for a section 86 offence include: Storing a firearm in a glovebox (see: R v Patrick, 2007 CanLII 7579 (ONSC)) Storing a firearm in a dresser (see: R v McDonald, 2016 BCSC 1648 (CanLII)) Storing a firearm by a furnace (see: R v Roussel, 2014 ABQB 202 (CanLII)) The Guilty Mind (Mens Rea) The mens rea or the guilty mind speaks to the accused’s degree of intent during the argued commission of… [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 3:30 am by Jon Choi
Brooks and Gamage’s work is especially timely given that the Supreme Court will rule on Moore v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:03 pm by John Elwood
” Now before the Supreme Court a second time, Escobar argues first that his case “presents the same question as Glossip v. [read post]