Search for: "Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000)"
Results 1 - 20
of 42
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2017, 12:25 pm
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83, 99-100, 103.) [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 12:36 pm
Foundation Health Psychcare Services Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 3:05 pm
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc., 24 Cal. 4th 83 (2000). [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:42 pm
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83, 100 (Armendariz).)Slip op., at 34. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 7:00 am
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc., 24 Cal.4th 83 (2000) (declining to enforce employment-related arbitration agreement that did not contain specific procedural safeguards) are pending at various levels of the state and federal courts. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 8:00 am
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83 and Pearson Dental Supplies, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 8:35 pm
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, 24 Cal.4th at 118, 99 (2000). [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 2:32 pm
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc., 24 Cal. 4th 83 (2000). [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 11:12 am
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc., 24 Cal.4th 83 (2000). [read post]
Another day, another arbitration decision; employee handbook arbitration clause found to be illusory
3 Aug 2012, 3:48 pm
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83, 105-106.) [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 2:38 pm
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83.) [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 8:00 am
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83; and Any requirement in the AAA rules that the plaintiff to pay one half of the arbitration fees should be severed and would not be cause to invalidate the arbitration clause. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 6:00 am
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83, the court found that four clauses in the arbitration provision were unconscionable, including clauses permitting an appeal only from an award exceeding $100,000 or that included injunctive relief, requiring the appealing party to pay appeal costs subject to an apportionment of those costs by the arbitrators, and exempting repossession from arbitration while requiring that requests… [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 10:31 am
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 5:30 pm
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83, 115.) [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc., 24 Cal.4th 83 (2000), notwithstanding AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 1:52 pm
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc., 24 Cal. 4th 83 (2000). [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 7:00 am
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83, 114. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:18 am
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:54 am
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83, 114, the Court found that the agreement was procedurally unconscionable as a contract of adhesion, implemented on a take-it-or-leave-it basis. [read post]