Search for: "Arnold v. Sharpe" Results 1 - 20 of 78
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2024, 4:50 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Lord Justice Arnold gave observations on the EBA’s decision in G2/21. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 10:16 am by Giles Peaker
Reading Borough Council v Holland (2023) EWHC 1902 (Ch) An appeal of a possession order made at first instance for Ms Holland’s introductory tenancy of sheltered accommodation. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm by INFORRM
By majority (Sharp P and Dingemans LJ), the appeal was dismissed. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am by INFORRM
As mentioned above, on 20 and 21 July 2022, the Court of Appeal (Vos MR, Sharp P and King LJ) heard the appeal Guardian News and Media v Executor of HRH Prince Philip challenging the decision to exclude the press from the hearing in September 2021 regarding the will of Prince Philip. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 11:09 pm by Florian Mueller
I'm sure they just couldn't do anything about Judge Kuehnen, who based on how that (mis)judgment reads was just hell-bent to enjoin and may have known SWM's lead counsel too well as a result of certain seminars they co-organized.The Arnold Ruess firm made Quinn Emanuel almost look like fools when Arnold Ruess represented Nokia and Quinn was defending Daimler. [read post]
26 May 2021, 8:40 pm by Adeline Chong
A distinctive feature of Singapore law on issue estoppel is the rejection of the broadly worded “special circumstances” exception to issue in English common law (Arnold v National Westminster Bank plc [1991] 2 AC 93). [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 9:39 am by Florian Mueller
Matthias Zigann) granted Sharp an injunction against Daimler (which triggered a settlement, see 1, 2), as did the 21st Civil Chamber in a Conversant v. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 5:43 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
"  James Horgan, a former President of IP Federation and assistant managing counsel at Merck Sharp & Dohme, commented that the IP Federation is "better value than any commercial organization. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 3:49 am by Rachel Mumby (Bristows)
Floyd LJ’s judgment (with which Arnold LJ and Males LJ agreed) starts, as would be expected, with a summary of the background and timetable. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 6:51 am
The IPKat has now had some time to put its razor-sharp fangs into the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)'s decision in C-371/18 Sky v. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 12:09 pm
Blame old geezers like me | Mr Justice Arnold to become Lord Justice Arnold: congratulations! [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
On 16 and 17 July 2019 the Court of Appeal (Sharp P, Vos C and Davis LJ) heard the appeal against the judgment of Warby J in the case of Lloyd v Google LLC. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
ICO The ICO blog has a post by Deputy Chief Executive Paul Arnold explaining to small businesses why they need to pay the data protection fee. [read post]