Search for: "Arthur Andersen LLP"
Results 1 - 20
of 184
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2024, 1:39 pm
Arthur Andersen LLP, 44 Cal. 4th 937 (2008), the California Supreme Court had rejected the common law “rule of reasonableness” for employment noncompete agreements, and instead held that Business & Professions Code Section 16600 rendered noncompete agreements per se void unless the agreement fell within one of the statutory exceptions (generally, the sale of an entire business interest and associated goodwill). [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 1:35 pm
Arthur Andersen LLP, 44 Cal. 4th 937 (2008), the California Supreme Court had rejected the common law “rule of reasonableness” for employment noncompete agreements, and instead held that Business & Professions Code Section 16600 rendered noncompete agreements per se void unless the agreement fell within one of the statutory exceptions (generally, the sale of an entire business interest and associated goodwill). [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
Hoff at the law firm of McDermott, Will & Emery LLP. [read post]
29 Jun 2024, 8:34 pm
(quoting Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 5:17 am
It was part of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and has been described as “prompted by the exposure of Enron’s massive accounting fraud and revelations that the company’s outside auditor, Arthur Andersen LLP, had systematically destroyed potentially incriminating documents. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:16 am
The predecessors to Section 1512(c)(1) were focused on tampering with evidence, and the law was enacted in the wake of the Enron accounting fraud scandal and the disclosure that the company’s outside auditor, Arthur Andersen LLP, had destroyed documents that could be incriminating for the company. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 9:56 am
Arthur Andersen LLP (2008) — and creates a notice requirement for California employers who entered into a non-compete agreement with certain employees.Specifically, employers have until February 14, 2024, to notify any current employee, or any former employee who was employed after January 1, 2022, who signed a non-compete agreement, that the non-compete is void. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 10:59 am
Arthur Andersen LLP (2008) 44 Cal.4th 937 [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 4:58 pm
Arthur Andersen LLP (2008) 44 Cal.4th 937 [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 7:11 am
Arthur Andersen, LLP 44 Cal. 4th 937 (2008), which held that California’s existing noncompete statute, Section 16600 of the Business Professions Code, prohibits even narrowly drawn noncompetition agreements unless the agreement falls within a statutory exception. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 12:37 pm
Arthur Andersen LLP (2008) 44 Cal.4th 937, which addressed a non-solicitation of customers provision. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 12:37 pm
Arthur Andersen LLP (2008) 44 Cal.4th 937, which addressed a non-solicitation of customers provision. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
Arthur Andersen LLP (2008) 44 Cal.4th 937, to void the application of any noncompete agreement in an employment context, or any noncompete clause in an employment contract, no matter how narrowly tailored, that does not satisfy an exception in this chapter [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:18 am
Arthur Andersen LLP, to void any non-compete clause or agreement in an employment context, no matter how narrowly tailored, with limited exception. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 2:57 pm
Arthur Andersen LLP and void all employment noncompete agreements no matter how narrowly tailored. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 5:06 pm
Arthur Andersen LLP (2008) 44 Cal. 4th 937, to void any non-compete clause or agreement in an employment context, no matter how narrowly tailored, with limited exception. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:57 am
In Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 12:15 am
Arthur Andersen LLP, 44 Cal. 4th 937, 946 (2008). [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm
Arthur Andersen LLP. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 9:50 am
Arthur Andersen LLP (2008) 44 Cal.4th 937. [read post]
