Search for: "Artists Rights v. Smith*" Results 1 - 20 of 276
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2024, 7:41 am by Eric Goldman
Nealy alleged that he held the copyrights to Music Specialist’s songs and that Warner Chappell’s licensing activities infringed his rights. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:39 am by centerforartlaw
Furthermore, Hitler established several principles regarding what should be considered ideal for Aryan individuals, including artistic guidelines. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:38 am by Eric Goldman
Wilson that if he did not remove her name as a featured artist on the relevant song, she would “issue a take down. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 1:06 am by centerforartlaw
Prior to the enactment of the Visual Artists Rights Act (“VARA”), cases like Serra v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:29 am by centerforartlaw
The question of how to protect artistsrights in this burgeoning space becomes more urgent every day. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:37 am by Eric Goldman
Tomelleri (who has appeared on this blog before) illustrates fishes (see court exhibit on the right). [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 8:37 am by Erica Canas
From the functional aspects of patented features to the artistic expression guarded by copyright, and the brand identity encapsulated in trademarks, we'll navigate the intricacies of each avenue. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm by Aaron Moss
There’s also a separate copyright in a particular sound recording of that composition as performed by a recording artist. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:24 am by centerforartlaw
On the right, CoA from post-2020 (2020).Before Pest Control, there was Pictures on Walls (POW). [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Sometimes external environment-level innovation is more efficient: ramps v. stair climing wheelchairs. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm by Kluwer Patent blogger
It will focus on the s.10(3) trade mark infringement elements of the judgment and the potential impact this may have for rights holders. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm by Kluwer IP Reporter
It will focus on the s.10(3) trade mark infringement elements of the judgment and the potential impact this may have for rights holders. [read post]