Search for: "Attorney Grievance v. Brady" Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2019, 2:42 pm by John Elwood
When the revised grievance still included the rude commentary, Dahne refused to process the grievance, and Richey filed suit alleging violation of his First Amendment right to petition. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am by John Elwood
Watson accused the officer of breaking his radio and asked for a grievance form. [read post]
10 May 2017, 3:22 am by Michael Lowe
Dallas Chief Investigator Pleads Guilty to Taking Bribe Prosecutorial Misconduct in Texas Murder Trials: Prosecutors Fighting Against Misconduct Allegations Prosecutorial Misconduct in Texas Alert: Ethical Rules Held to Have Broader Duty Than Brady to Turn Over Exculpatory Evidence to the Defense District Attorneys Keep Doing Bad Things: More Texas Prosecutorial Misconduct Stories Prosecutorial Misconduct Still a Big, Big Problem: District Attorneys Do Bad Things. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am by John Elwood
It asks (1) whether the Louisiana courts erred in failing to find that the state’s failure to disclose exculpatory evidence violated its obligation under Brady v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 6:34 pm by Francesca Procaccini
” Connell raises two fundamental objections to the course of conduct order under McKaskle v. [read post]
”  However, in its press release on the new case, the NFLPA clarified that this collusion claim was previously unknown to the players, is entirely new, and therefore could not have been asserted in the Brady v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 4:19 am by Gideon
I wrote almost a month ago about the CT Supreme Court’s extraordinary decision in State v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 7:07 pm by Madelaine Lane
The Court declined to exercise superintending control in Brady v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Childs, No. 071495, 071597 Convictions for conspiracy to commit murder for hire resulting death are affirmed over claims that the district court erred by: 1) denying defendant's Rule 29 motion for acquittal; 2) allowing witness to testify to an out-of-court statement made by indicted co-conspirator; 3) requiring one defendant to testify under a statutory grant of use immunity at his co-defendant's trial; 4) failing to order one defendant, over his attorney's objections, to… [read post]