Search for: "Austin L. Hill"
Results 1 - 20
of 157
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
“Know then thyself, presume not God to scan; The proper study of Mankind is Man. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 7:11 pm
The 2A classification thus requires little substantively or semantically, and many 2A classifications leave juries and judges to determine whether a chemical or medication caused a human being’s cancer, when the basic predicates for Sir Austin Bradford Hill’s factors for causal judgment have not been met.[7] An IARC evaluation of Group 2A, or “probably carcinogenic to humans,” would seem to satisfy the legal system’s requirement that an exposure to the… [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
As with any methodology, the Bradford Hill factors are not self-executing. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 1:59 am
Robyn Dixon, Kareem Fahim, and David L. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 9:37 pm
‘Just Off K Street’ Lobbyist Sheds Instagram Alias and Day Job Bloomberg Law – Jack Fitzpatrick | Published: 1/26/2023 The lobbyist behind the popular Instagram account about Washington’s lobbying culture is stepping away from the daily grind on Capitol Hill, but not before shedding her anonymity. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 3:52 am
Laura Kelly reports for The Hill. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 8:00 am
., No. 17 L 3541. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 1:24 pm
Edward K. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 4:57 am
Hill that the pre-Roe criminal abortion bans in Texas had been “repealed by implication. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
The Bradford Hill Predicate: Ruling Out Random and Systematic Error In two recent posts, I spent some time discussing a recent law review, which had some important things to say about specific causation.[1] One of several points from which I dissented was the article’s argument that Sir Austin Bradford Hill had not made explicit that ruling out random and systematic error was required before assessing his nine “viewpoints” on whether an association was… [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm
The authors also offer the insight, for which they claim novelty, that some of the Bradford Hill guidelines, although stated as part of assessing general causation, have some relevancy to decisions concerning specific causation.[12] The [read post]
24 May 2022, 4:08 am
Sarakshi Rai reports for The Hill. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 4:22 am
The gathering will be led by U.S. defense secretary Lloyd Austin following his meeting with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Sunday. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 4:41 am
Caroline Vakil reports for The Hill. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 8:00 am
Foss, No. 2017 L 106 (Ill. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
Interviewed on Spectrum News Austin about January 6, 2021 (Jan. 6, 2021). [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 12:21 pm
Bernard-Henri Lévy, philosopher, filmmaker and author of the book, “The will to see: dispatches from a world of misery and hope,” will open the discussion with keynote remarks. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
”[1] In other words, before we even embark on consideration of Bradford Hill’s nine considerations, we should have ruled out chance, bias, and confounding as an explanation for the claimed association.[2] Although confounding is sometimes considered as a type of systematic bias, its importance warrants its own category. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 8:25 pm
” John Kruzel of The Hill reports that “Supreme Court allows abortion providers to sue over Texas law. [read post]
