Search for: "B. Brand"
Results 1 - 20
of 4,971
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2024, 9:30 pm
A discussion of Jennifer Black's Branding Trust. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm
In collaboration with Eagle Protect, the analysis from the B. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 5:19 am
Respondents saw “a mock-up of the front of a brand-neutral product package and [were instructed] to ‘examine it like you were shopping’ ” and “to assume that the nutrition snack bar is a ‘popular national brand. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:18 am
In re Kirill’s Big Brain, LLC, Serial No. 97359799 (May 22, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Wendy B. [read post]
27 May 2024, 9:03 pm
B. [read post]
26 May 2024, 12:44 am
A possible key solution would be unique stylizations, the creation of distinctive combinations of multiple emoji into a logo or design or a possible acquired distinctiveness.The history of The Smiley is an example of the work by brand licensors to protect their heritage. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:22 am
Who qualifies: Americans who have paid foreign taxes that are a) legal, b) based on income, and c) paid in their name How to claim it: File Form 1116 Foreign Earned Income Exclusion (FEIE) What it does: The FEIE allows Americans abroad to exclude a certain portion of their foreign earned income from income taxes (but not self-employment taxes). [read post]
24 May 2024, 4:21 am
The Treaty is a momentous achievement, but being brand new does not insulate the Treaty from criticism. [read post]
23 May 2024, 11:08 am
Punishment for Fraternity Hazing in Texas Failing to report hazing and hazing that does not result in serious bodily injury are both Class B misdemeanors, punishable by up to 180 days in jail and a maximum $2000 fine. [read post]
23 May 2024, 11:08 am
Punishment for Fraternity Hazing in Texas Failing to report hazing and hazing that does not result in serious bodily injury are both Class B misdemeanors, punishable by up to 180 days in jail and a maximum $2000 fine. [read post]
23 May 2024, 11:08 am
Punishment for Fraternity Hazing in Texas Failing to report hazing and hazing that does not result in serious bodily injury are both Class B misdemeanors, punishable by up to 180 days in jail and a maximum $2000 fine. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:03 pm
Authors: Liz Hastilow, Ray Giblett, James Morris, Rajaee Rouhani, Stephen Lee, Jeremy Moller, Charles Nugent-Young, Merren Taylor, Timothy Chan, Joshua Kan, Steven Li, Liam Mackay and Mia Blundell. [read post]
19 May 2024, 10:27 pm
Fashion brands are often named after their founder and chief designer. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:32 am
And consider how they created a profound and sustained connection to their public, and how they resisted branding, commercial sponsorship, and corporate affiliation and hype. [read post]
15 May 2024, 2:15 am
Descriptive terms may be eligible for trademark protection if they acquire a secondary meaning, indicating a strong association with a specific brand over time. [read post]
13 May 2024, 8:31 am
Healthwest Minerals, Inc. d/b/a Mt. [read post]
11 May 2024, 4:51 am
And what can this tell us about branding strategy for plants? [read post]
10 May 2024, 5:10 am
Specifically, the label warned that “[b]oth the risk of developing the syndrome and the likelihood that it will become irreversible are believed to increase with the duration of treatment and the total cumulative dose. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
[M]aterial dealing with sex in a manner that advocates ideas, or that has literary or scientific or artistic value or any other form of social importance, may not be branded as obscenity and denied ... constitutional protection.[6]Petitioners’ argument rests upon the assumption that fictional works describing or portraying human sexuality are per se objectionable and subject to exclusion from school libraries. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
[M]aterial dealing with sex in a manner that advocates ideas, or that has literary or scientific or artistic value or any other form of social importance, may not be branded as obscenity and denied ... constitutional protection.[6]Petitioners’ argument rests upon the assumption that fictional works describing or portraying human sexuality are per se objectionable and subject to exclusion from school libraries. [read post]
