Search for: "BEAR v. STATE"
Results 1 - 20
of 14,848
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am
‘Now is the time to reassess presumption of parental involvement’, writes Lea Levine in the April issue of the journal[1]. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 2:47 am
In Sharfman M.D.P.A. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 1:58 pm
This decision was brought to the Court as a certified question from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Carl v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:21 am
While the Crown must prove the elements of the offence beyond a reasonable doubt, you bear the responsibility of raising certain defences at trial. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:50 am
In general, the best defences are: Legitimate Reasoning & No Undue Harm Section 163.1(6) of the Code states that if the material in question was produced for a legitimate reason related to the administration of justice, science, medicine, education or art; and it does not pose an undue risk of harm to minors, then you cannot be convicted. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 6:36 am
[RTI Limited v MUR Shipping BV [2024 UKSC 18]https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2022-0172-judgment.pdf [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 4:10 am
In United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 5:22 pm
Antonyuk v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
See Leslie v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 3:28 pm
” Coates v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 2:00 pm
Rich Ford: Tell us about Brown v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
Although every dismissed employee bears the onus of mitigating the damages that arise from wrongful termination, it is the employer who bears the burden of proving the failure to adequately mitigate. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
Although every dismissed employee bears the onus of mitigating the damages that arise from wrongful termination, it is the employer who bears the burden of proving the failure to adequately mitigate. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
In Rumsfeld v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 2:08 pm
Supreme Court delivered a major victory for free speech and struck a blow against government censorship-by-proxy yesterday in NRA v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:35 pm
In Bantam Books v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 10:03 am
While the defense argued that the defendants were not guilty of subversion as subverting state power involves the use or threat of force, the court referenced HKSAR v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Certainly, traditions leading up to and ensuing from enactment of constitutional text can bear on understandings of adopted words. [read post]
29 May 2024, 11:16 am
In REV, LLC v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 11:10 am
Seifert v. [read post]