Search for: "BEER V US" Results 1 - 20 of 1,370
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[FN1] Thereafter, the LGPC submitted permit applications and supporting materials for the use of ProcellaCOR in both bays. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[FN1] Thereafter, the LGPC submitted permit applications and supporting materials for the use of ProcellaCOR in both bays. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 3:38 am by Eleonora Rosati
Conversely, the Artpusher case resulted in a ruling against the gallery, emphasizing that trademark law does not harbor a parody exception akin to that in copyright law, marking a clear boundary for artists and commercial entities alike regarding the use of trademarks in art, especially for commercial purposes.In the Jack Daniel's v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
It noted, quoting Justice Byron White’s concurring opinion in Furman v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 11:01 am by Dennis Crouch
The PTAB relied on CyberSource Corp. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 10:30 pm by Ingo Venzke
The advertising ban at issue does not appear comparable to an advertising ban on alcohol where in most Member States there is particular local production of beers or wines that may be more familiar to local consumers. [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 11:38 am by Michael Oykhman
Weapons are defined under s. 2 of the Criminal Code (1988): a weapon is anything that is used or intended to be used to cause injury, death, for the purpose of threatening or intimidating another as well as any firearms defined under s. 82 of the Criminal Code (1988). [read post]