Search for: "BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGAN, INC."
Results 1 - 20
of 33
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (6th Cir. 2016) (noting that "only the most compelling reasons can justify non-disclosure of judicial records. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
The orders were neither ultra vires nor exceptional—The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure have been moving toward greater ownership transparency for years, the advisory committees have recommended that judges have the right to such disclosure and are considering further requirements,[21] and similar requirements in Federal District courts across the nation have been in place for years, in districts in, for example, California, Georgia, Iowa, Maryland, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey,… [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 9:41 am
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Mutual Insurance Co., 2022 WL 821668 (E.D. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 3:48 pm
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (Medicare Like Rates)United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 2:12 pm
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (Fiduciary Duty)Singer v. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 2:52 pm
Supreme Court’s March 2018 entry of its opinion in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 2:52 pm
Supreme Court’s March 2018 entry of its opinion in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 5:01 am
Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of N.J., 663 F.3d 1124, 1135 (10th Cir. 2011). [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 1:46 pm
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, Nos. 15-1544/1551/1552, included class certification briefing and the named plaintiffs’ expert report that purported to detail the scope of antitrust damage suffered by three million to seven million putative class members. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 1:46 pm
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, Nos. 15-1544/1551/1552, included class certification briefing and the named plaintiffs’ expert report that purported to detail the scope of antitrust damage suffered by three million to seven million putative class members. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Isonas, Inc., 2014 WL 10988340 (C.D. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:10 am
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 7:15 pm
The petition of the day is: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan v. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 2:58 am
Of the other six, five have contracted with regulated private insurers (such as Blue Cross Blue Shield) to offer a health insurance plan to their employees, while the sixth offers its employees access to “self-insured” plans that are administered by private parties such as Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan and Express Scripts. [read post]
22 May 2014, 8:55 am
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, the Sixth Circuit upheld a determination that Blue Cross Blue Shield functioned as an ERISA fiduciary and breached that fiduciary duty, justifying $5.1 million in damages and nearly a million dollars in pre-judgment interest. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 3:02 pm
BCBSTX Member Resources Earlier today, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas also shared an e-mail with its employer group plan sponsors containing resources for members of plans it insures or administers. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 10:15 am
Justice Department and the Michigan Attorney General filed an antitrust complaint in October 2010 against Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan over its use of MFN clauses in contracts with hospitals. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 7:32 am
Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan ("Blue Cross") for pressuring 22 of Michigan's 131 hospitals to sign illegal "most favored nation-plus" contracts. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 7:06 am
The appeal had been taken by Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Michigan in connection with an antitrust suit brought by the State of Michigan which sought to enjoin Blue Cross from using most favored nation clauses in its contracts with Michigan hospitals. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 11:28 am
Health insurance giant Aetna, Inc. has filed a complaint in a Michigan federal district court claiming that Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan has engaged in a scheme to force Aetna to pay more for hospital services as part of a campaign to limit or reduce Aetna’s presence in Michigan. [read post]
