Search for: "BOARD OF PERSONNEL APPEALS v DEPT"
Results 1 - 20
of 76
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2024, 6:00 am
Indeed, a case involving one of respondent’s employees arising after enactment of Civil Service Law § 72 (1) considered and applied Education Law § 2568 without reference to the Civil Service Law (Newman v Board of Educ. of City Sch. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:00 am
Indeed, a case involving one of respondent’s employees arising after enactment of Civil Service Law § 72 (1) considered and applied Education Law § 2568 without reference to the Civil Service Law (Newman v Board of Educ. of City Sch. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
The New York Civil Liberties Union, Amicus Curiae, The New York City Bar Association, Amicus Curiae.Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Frank P. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
The New York Civil Liberties Union, Amicus Curiae, The New York City Bar Association, Amicus Curiae.Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Frank P. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
In Holt v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
In Holt v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
" Accordingly, the Commissioner dismissed Petitioner's appeal and denied Petitioner's application.* §277.1(b) sets out the specific notice required for removal applications pursuant to Education Law §306, which is distinct from the notice required under §275.11(a) for appeals pursuant to Education Law §310. ** See Matter of Lloyd v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
" Accordingly, the Commissioner dismissed Petitioner's appeal and denied Petitioner's application.* §277.1(b) sets out the specific notice required for removal applications pursuant to Education Law §306, which is distinct from the notice required under §275.11(a) for appeals pursuant to Education Law §310. ** See Matter of Lloyd v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
In the words of the Appellate Division, "ADR benefits are awardable only where the individual's disability was the natural and proximate result of a service-related accident, i.e., "a 'sudden, fortuitous mischance, unexpected, out of the ordinary, and injurious in impact'", citing Matter of Brown v Kelly, 100 AD3d 480, quoting Matter of Lichtenstein v Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of Police Dept. of City of NY, Art. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
In the words of the Appellate Division, "ADR benefits are awardable only where the individual's disability was the natural and proximate result of a service-related accident, i.e., "a 'sudden, fortuitous mischance, unexpected, out of the ordinary, and injurious in impact'", citing Matter of Brown v Kelly, 100 AD3d 480, quoting Matter of Lichtenstein v Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of Police Dept. of City of NY, Art. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 11:55 am
Cases 894 (Appeals Board en banc) [added to Ch. 6, § 6.05] (Appeals Board rejects applicant’s contention that a vocational expert may substitute a competing theory of apportionment in place of an otherwise valid legal apportionment) Olson v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
BOCES appealed the Supreme Court's ruling. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
BOCES appealed the Supreme Court's ruling. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 4:37 am
Appeals Board En Banc Decision Nunes (Grace) v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm
Dept. of Industrial Relations (1989) 48 Cal. 3d 341, 769 P.2d 399, 256 Cal. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 4:41 am
The BDO Seidman Test No treatment of New York’s law of restrictive covenants would be complete without mention of the Court of Appeals’ seminal decision in BDO Seidman v Hirshberg (93 NY2d 382 [1999]). [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 5:45 am
Div., 1st Dept. 2018), leave to appeal denied, 2019 N.Y. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
Irving Selecoff arrived in Glasgow, Scotland, from New York City, on board the SS. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
NLRB v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:02 am
Circuit had also previously used this language, and Fischbach cites the general rule that courts cannot serve as super-personnel boards. [read post]