Search for: "BOARD OF PERSONNEL APPEALS v DEPT" Results 1 - 20 of 76
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Indeed, a case involving one of respondent’s employees arising after enactment of Civil Service Law § 72 (1) considered and applied Education Law § 2568 without reference to the Civil Service Law (Newman v Board of Educ. of City Sch. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Indeed, a case involving one of respondent’s employees arising after enactment of Civil Service Law § 72 (1) considered and applied Education Law § 2568 without reference to the Civil Service Law (Newman v Board of Educ. of City Sch. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The New York Civil Liberties Union, Amicus Curiae, The New York City Bar Association, Amicus Curiae.Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Frank P. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The New York Civil Liberties Union, Amicus Curiae, The New York City Bar Association, Amicus Curiae.Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Frank P. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Accordingly, the Commissioner dismissed Petitioner's appeal and denied Petitioner's application.* §277.1(b) sets out the specific notice required for removal applications pursuant to Education Law §306, which is distinct from the notice required under §275.11(a) for appeals pursuant to Education Law §310. ** See Matter of Lloyd v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Accordingly, the Commissioner dismissed Petitioner's appeal and denied Petitioner's application.* §277.1(b) sets out the specific notice required for removal applications pursuant to Education Law §306, which is distinct from the notice required under §275.11(a) for appeals pursuant to Education Law §310. ** See Matter of Lloyd v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In the words of the Appellate Division, "ADR benefits are awardable only where the individual's disability was the natural and proximate result of a service-related accident, i.e., "a 'sudden, fortuitous mischance, unexpected, out of the ordinary, and injurious in impact'", citing Matter of Brown v Kelly, 100 AD3d 480, quoting Matter of Lichtenstein v Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of Police Dept. of City of NY, Art. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In the words of the Appellate Division, "ADR benefits are awardable only where the individual's disability was the natural and proximate result of a service-related accident, i.e., "a 'sudden, fortuitous mischance, unexpected, out of the ordinary, and injurious in impact'", citing Matter of Brown v Kelly, 100 AD3d 480, quoting Matter of Lichtenstein v Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of Police Dept. of City of NY, Art. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 11:55 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Cases 894 (Appeals Board en banc) [added to Ch. 6, § 6.05] (Appeals Board rejects applicant’s contention that a vocational expert may substitute a competing theory of apportionment in place of an otherwise valid legal apportionment) Olson v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 4:41 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The BDO Seidman Test No treatment of New York’s law of restrictive covenants would be complete without mention of the Court of Appeals’ seminal decision in BDO Seidman v Hirshberg (93 NY2d 382 [1999]). [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
Irving Selecoff arrived in Glasgow, Scotland, from New York City, on board the SS. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:02 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Circuit had also previously used this language, and Fischbach cites the general rule that courts cannot serve as super-personnel boards. [read post]