Search for: "BRAND X INTERNET SERVICES V FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSIONS" Results 1 - 20 of 37
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Circuit under Chevron.[10] The FCC, under the Biden administration, has voted to reclassify Internet broadband access as a communications service, subject to Title II.[11] All of this is possible under Chevron, which, as the D.C. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 6:33 am by Randolph J. May
Brand X Internet Services, the Supreme Court affirmed in a 5-4 split decision the FCC’s discretion to decide whether to impose net neutrality regulation on internet service providers based on the Court’s determination that the relevant statutory provisions are ambiguous. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:05 pm by Justin (Gus) Hurwitz
The story is similar to the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) efforts since 1998 to fit consumer internet service into the same Telecommunications Act’s statutory framework, resulting in repeated trips to the Courts of Appeals and the Supreme Court. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 8:45 pm by James Romoser and Andrew Hamm
Brand X Internet Services; and (2) whether the divided 9th Circuit erred in affirming the FCC’s interpretation of 47 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 7:30 am by Berin Szóka, Corbin Barthold
The key, as Thomas explained in his 2005 Brand X decision, is “how the consumer perceives the service being offered. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm by rainey Reitman
Brand X Internet Services Decision (Wikipedia)   Cable Wins Internet-Access Ruling (New York Times) New Neutrality Takes a Wild Ride: 2014 in Review (EFF) DC Circuit Court’s Decision in Verizon v FCC  An Attack on Net Neutrality Is an Attack on Free Speech (EFF) D.C. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 6:00 am by Jon Brodkin
Brand X Internet Services, better known as Brand X, Thomas wrote the 6-3 majority opinion that upheld a Federal Communications Commission decision to classify cable broadband as an information service. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 11:13 am by Jonathan H. Adler
FCC begins: In 2018, the Federal Communications Commission adopted an order classifying broadband Internet access service as an information service under Title I of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 7:53 am by Aurora Barnes
Charter Advanced Services, LLC 18-1386 Issues: (1) Whether, in the absence of a Federal Communications Commission decision classifying Voice over Internet Protocol service as an information service, FCC policy can conflict with and pre-empt state regulation of VoIP service; and (2) whether VoIP service is a telecommunications service or an information service, under the appropriate functional test… [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am by msatta
Though the complaint was unanimously approved by a Republican-led Federal Trade Commission, and the agency based its case on the testimony of one of the nation’s most prominent conservative economists, Judge Kavanaugh thought it would “turn back the clock” to the “the bad old days when mergers were viewed with suspicion regardless of their economic benefits. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 11:08 am
Brand X Internet Servs., 545 U.S. 967, 988 (2005) (explaining that “all information-service providers . . . use ‘telecommunications’ to provide consumers with [their] service”). [3]            The court did not consider VoIP protocol conversion as fitting within three categories where some processing takes place, but not in a significant way that fundamentally changes the… [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 11:08 am
Brand X Internet Servs., 545 U.S. 967, 988 (2005) (explaining that “all information-service providers . . . use ‘telecommunications’ to provide consumers with [their] service”). [3]            The court did not consider VoIP protocol conversion as fitting within three categories where some processing takes place, but not in a significant way that fundamentally changes the… [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 9:30 pm by Randolph J. May
Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) long saga dealing with “net neutrality” regulation. [read post]