Search for: "BROWN v. HARMON"
Results 1 - 20
of 93
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2024, 5:55 am
For instance in Tremblay et al. v. [read post]
Celanese v. ITC: Can a Secret Manufacturing Process Be Patented After Sale of the Resulting Product?
4 Mar 2024, 9:45 am
Auld Company v. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 10:00 pm
For her, the CJEU’s decisions ‘have contributed greatly to the overall EU harmonization project’. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
The Securities and Exchange Commission regulations on climate disclosure, first proposed in March 2022 and likely to be issued in final form in October 2023,[1] have drawn considerable controversy and face an uncertain fate in the inevitable litigation.[2] Much less attention has gone to two bills that are moving toward adoption in California. [read post]
Personnel services company pays $9.9 million to settle False Claims Act case for underpaid Visa Fees
10 Jul 2023, 7:13 am
Michael Harmon v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 4:23 pm
During oral argument in Department of Education v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
Thank you Thomas [Kim] for that lovely introduction and I’m very pleased to be here at the Securities Regulation Institute giving the Alan B. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
I view this harmonization as a core outcome of the book. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
Roe v. [read post]
25 May 2021, 4:00 am
" Citing Andryeyeva v New York Health Care, Inc., 33 NY3d 152, the Appellate Division said that in construing a statute, "words must be 'harmonize[d]' and read together to avoid surplusage. [read post]
25 May 2021, 4:00 am
" Citing Andryeyeva v New York Health Care, Inc., 33 NY3d 152, the Appellate Division said that in construing a statute, "words must be 'harmonize[d]' and read together to avoid surplusage. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 5:01 am
It was not until 1961, in Monroe v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 6:01 am
Wahlquist, Sabastian V. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 8:31 am
From Edward Snowden to Luxembourg The case, Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 10:17 am
* Clarks v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 4:30 am
See, e.g., Brown Bag Software, 960 F.2d at 1473–74 (relying on expert testimony to identify the objective points of comparison among different computer software programs); Swirsky v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
The Court of Chancery reviewed its past decisions on this issue, beginning with Brown v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 2:55 am
‘But not everything is redressable in a court.'” [Sixth Circuit, Crosby v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
Health Reform Erin Fuse Brown, Georgia State University College of Law, Could States Do Single-Payer? [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 7:58 pm
UPDATE: Texas Supreme Court denied review 5/24/2019 CLAIM-FRACTURING CUM APPELLATE GALORE Natgasoline LLC v. [read post]
