Search for: "BROWNING v. AKINS"
Results 1 - 20
of 227
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 4:01 am
A third interim order was made in March 2021 after a contested application by the father to have the child returned to Chilliwack (SZM v KMN, 2021 BCSC 365 (CanLII), (which was decided before Barendregt v Grebliunas, 2022 SCC 22 (CanLII), more on the significance of this case below)). [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 7:01 pm
Judge Harvie Wilkinson, who in 2009 called Heller a form of "judicial activism" akin to Roe v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
& Pol'y Rev. 53, 66 & n.49, 98 & n.207 (1999); see also Timothy Farrar, Manual of the Constitution of the United States of America 436 (Boston, Little, Brown, & Co. 3d ed. rev. 1872) ("The general power of impeachment and trial may extend to others besides civil officers, as military or naval officers, or even persons not in office, and to other offences than those expressly requiring a judgment of removal from office . . . . [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 5:30 am
Jackson Women’s Health Organization are correct that its quasi-originalist “history-and-tradition” approach is inconsistent with Brown v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Trump v. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 8:10 am
State v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 9:15 am
2022cv1564-24 [9] Feist Publications, Inc., v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 3:47 am
For example, in a 1969 case, Watts v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm
On October 26, Geoffrey Stone, University of Chicago Law School, will deliver The Warren Court v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 12:48 pm
If you are concerned about your legal rights in California with respect to former employees suspected of misappropriating confidential information to compete with your company, the authors of this article previously authored Protecting Trade Secrets In States That Disfavor Noncompetes, which covers best practices to protect against unfair competition by former employees, given California’s ever-changing legal landscape. 1 See Brown v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
COVID-19 Pandemic Issues The Honorable Susan V. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
See White v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Brown argued that the Supreme Court’s decision in International Shoe v Washington, the proper test of jurisdiction is whether the corporation satisfies the minimum contact test. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
Cartier, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
The Securities and Exchange Commission regulations on climate disclosure, first proposed in March 2022 and likely to be issued in final form in October 2023,[1] have drawn considerable controversy and face an uncertain fate in the inevitable litigation.[2] Much less attention has gone to two bills that are moving toward adoption in California. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:38 pm
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 133–35 (2000). [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 10:06 am
Justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 3:46 pm
Over fifty years ago, in Bruton v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 11:15 am
A private individual is akin to a third-party beneficiary of that contract. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 7:26 pm
In the case of Brown v. [read post]
