Search for: "BULL V US" Results 1 - 20 of 2,292
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2024, 2:39 pm by Unknown
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2024.html Old Bull v. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 6:10 am by Just Security
Criminal Responsibility for Organized Armed Groups by Rogier Bartels (@RogierBartels) Immigration Law and Policy Why Trump v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 12:09 pm by Unknown
(Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (RLUIPA); Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA)) Xia, et al. v. [read post]
11 May 2024, 6:56 am
It might be as useful to also consider the active cultivation of solidarity and stability protective internal measures to ensure the autonomy and coherence of a cognitive system. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:51 pm by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
  Apparently, the expression has its origins from an 1870 trial in Missouri, Burden v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am by Frank Cranmer
This may be used to defeat future claims without even engaging with the question of justification. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 12:16 am by Marcel Pemsel
Concerning the correspondence between the colour sample and the description, the Court referred to Red Bull v EUIPO (case C-124/18 P, IPKat here), in which the CJEU found that the description must serve to clarify the subject matter and scope of protection sought. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
-NAP is at its most powerful and potentially useful not as a direct manifestation of state power through law, but by embracing methods of regulatory governance that enhance the use of market levers to manage preferred behaviors. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 5:13 pm by Jeanne Huang
Vázquez will focus on developments in the United States, including such recent decisions as Mallory v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:42 pm by USPTO
The guidance builds on the existing inventorship framework and the “significant contribution” test from the Federal Circuit’s 1998 Pannu case (Pannu v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 8:24 am by Just Security
Israel-Hamas War Between Rhetoric and Effects: The ICJ Provisional Measures Order in South Africa v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 6:02 am by Alessandro Cerri
 In respect of unfair advantage, the Court noted that, following L’Oréal SA v Bellure NV (C-487/07), what it was concerned with was whether Aldi had attempted to take advantage of, or ride on the coat tails of the Mark, in order to exploit it and gain a benefit from its reputation and Thatchers' marketing efforts which have been made by Thatchers.It would also suffice if the objective effect of Aldi's use was to enable it to benefit from… [read post]