Search for: "Bailie v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 30
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2022, 3:28 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 11:06 am
Anonymous #1, now pending in Brooklyn state trial court.] [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 7:14 am
which he concludes thusly:The California Supreme Court in the recent decision Daly v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 4:05 pm
Toibb v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 11:19 am
Court Denies "Alternate Theory of Guilt" Motion for DismissalUnited States of America v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 4:38 am
Moreover, “[a]llegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 4:16 am
” “Here, accepting the facts alleged in the complaint as true, and according the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, the plaintiff stated a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice (see Tooma v Grossbarth, 121 AD3d at 1095-1096; Endless Ocean, LLC v Twomey, Latham, Shea, Kelley, Dubin & Quartararo, 113 AD3d 587, 589; Reynolds v Picciano, 29 AD2d 1012, 1012). [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 5:16 am
Ornamentality v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 5:16 am
Ornamentality v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 11:05 am
An odd appeal on an adverse possession case, of no legal interest per se, but entertaining on the facts.Devanney v LB Hounslow [2012] EWCA Civ 1660 [not on baili yet. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 11:05 am
An odd appeal on an adverse possession case, of no legal interest per se, but entertaining on the facts.Devanney v LB Hounslow [2012] EWCA Civ 1660 [not on baili yet. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 5:28 am
In R(Hamid) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 3070 (Admin) [not on Baili yet, but apparently on Lawtel], the Divisional Court signalled its intention to get much tougher on out of hours administrative court applications to the duty Judge. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 10:20 am
And he also had the redoubtable Nathalie Lieven QC and David Blundell acting for EM (presumably pro bono, although this isn't stated). [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 10:20 am
And he also had the redoubtable Nathalie Lieven QC and David Blundell acting for EM (presumably pro bono, although this isn't stated). [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm
One such case has landed on the NL virtual desk and, although not strictly housing related – being a business lease – it is an opportunity to remind ourselves of the criteria for wasted costs orders.Odihambo v Gooch Birmingham County Court, 24 October 2011 [Not available on Baili. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm
One such case has landed on the NL virtual desk and, although not strictly housing related – being a business lease – it is an opportunity to remind ourselves of the criteria for wasted costs orders.Odihambo v Gooch Birmingham County Court, 24 October 2011 [Not available on Baili. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 3:25 pm
Aliya Sharif v Camden LBC [2011] EWCA Civ 463 (on Lawtel, not on Baili yet) The issue on this appeal to the Court of Appeal was whether provision of two separate flats on the same floor of a building used as a hostel could be suitable as temporary accommodation for the applicant's household. [read post]
