Search for: "Baker v. Workers Compensation Appeals Board" Results 1 - 20 of 38
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Robinson, co-author, Larson’s WorkersCompensation Law Editorial Note: All section references below are to Larson’s WorkersCompensation Law, unless otherwise indicated. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 5:00 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Appeals Board Panel Decisions CAUTION: These WCAB panel decisions have not been designated a “significant panel decision” by the WorkersCompensation Appeals Board. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am by Sasha Volokh
Accounting Oversight Board, 561 U.S. 477, 496–97 (2010) (quoting Clinton v. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 8:40 pm by Dale Carpenter
“In each of these cases,” we argued, “the plaintiffs won the identified benefit at the district court level, lost it on appeal to the Sixth Circuit, see DeBoer v. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
As already mentioned, on 24, 25 and 26 January 2017, the Supreme Court (Lords Neuberger, Mance, Sumption, Hughes and Hodge) heard the joined appeals in the cases of Flood v Times Newspapers, Miller v Associated Newspapers and Frost v MGN. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by John Elwood
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 14-200, on for its second relist. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 4:05 am by Lee Tankle
The WorkersCompensation Appeal Board found that because the employer encouraged the physical activity, which caused Claimant’s injury, the Claimant was furthering the interests of the employer at the time he was injured. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 4:05 am by Lee Tankle
The Workers' Compensation Appeal Board found that because the employer encouraged the physical activity, which caused Claimant's injury, the Claimant was furthering the interests of the employer at the time he was injured. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:40 am by David DePaolo
This morning's WorkCompCentral story about the recent California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board's Significant Panel Decision in Bodam v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 4:08 am by David J. DePaolo
The State Board of Workers' Compensation Appellate Division upheld the judge's action, as did the superior court, but last December, a narrow majority of the Georgia Court of Appeals reversed. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 4:32 am by David J. DePaolo
The amicus group say the State Board of Workers' Compensation had construed this language more liberally, and that the court "should have given them deference. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
The Board enforced the regulation against a physician who did not possess the required specialty board certification. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 9:02 am by Albert Navarra
"     COLA Update The California Supreme Court clarified, in Baker v. [read post]