Search for: "Barnes v. Social Security Administration"
Results 1 - 20
of 41
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm
Supreme Court Asks Biden Administration to Weigh in on Social Media Case MSN – Robert Barnes and Cat Zakrzewski (Washington Post) | Published: 1/23/2023 The U.S. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 3:45 am
International Smuggling and Counterfeiting Hurts Americans Smuggling that occurs within the borders of the United States is mostly a zero-sum activity from a cost perspective, and smugglers may even facilitate an increase in total economic activity by decreasing the market tax burden, albeit at unacceptably high social costs (not to mention the innate criminal nature of the activity). [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A Landmark Supreme Court Fight Over Social Media Now Looks Likely MSN – Robert Barnes and Ann Marimow (Washington Post) | Published: 9/19/2022 Conflicting lower court rulings about removing controversial material from social media platforms point toward a landmark U.S. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 9:01 am
” Last week, the Fifth Circuit released a real barn-burner of an opinion in the matter of NetChoice v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
The Biden administration argues Congress intended the provision as an anti-corruption measure. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
“Not since Bush v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am
SHAK v. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 2:40 pm
(This op-ed was first published in Just Security on April 13, 2020.) [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 3:56 am
Garcia that federal immigration law does not preempt a state prosecution for identity theft for using someone else’s Social Security number to obtain employment. [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:15 am
Berryhill, the court unanimously held that a Social Security Administration Appeals Council dismissal on timeliness grounds of a request for review after a claimant has had an administrative law judge hearing on the merits qualifies as a “final decision . . . made after a hearing” for purposes of allowing judicial review under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 4:16 am
Berryhill, that a 25 percent cap in the Social Security Act on the award of attorney’s fees applies only to fees for representing a client in court, and not to aggregate fees for both court representation and representation before the agency. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 3:57 am
Berryhill, in which the justices considered social security benefits claimants’ ability to scrutinize the data on which benefits denials are based. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:09 am
Berryhill, in which the justices will consider social-security-benefits claimants’ ability to scrutinize the data on which benefits denials are based. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am
They could frustrate government responses to social problems in a way not seen in America since the Great Depression. [read post]
7 Jul 2018, 12:29 pm
” The party had argued that the act requires states to successfully match voters with computer records in the state’s driver’s license database or the Social Security database before they could register to vote or have their votes counted. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:59 am
In United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 6:55 am
And in NAACP v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
Barnes, 443 S.W.3d 87, 100 (Tex. 2014); Life Ass'n of Am. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 7:45 pm
Barnes v. [read post]
