Search for: "Barnhill"
Results 1 - 20
of 174
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
The leading case of Barnhill v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:11 pm
Pihos of Miner Barnhill & Galland PC Continue reading › The post Top Verdict in Illinois in 2022 appeared first on Illinois Personal Injury Lawyer Blog. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 7:06 am
Barnhill, Delaware’s courts have proven to be more receptive to Caremark claims than in the past. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 5:36 pm
Barnhill, breach of the duty of oversight claims (or Caremark claims, as they are sometimes called) have in recent years, as Vice Chancellor Sam Glasscock put in in his recent opinion in the SolarWinds case, “bloomed like dandelions after a warm spring rain. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 5:44 am
Every year after Labor Day, I take a step back to survey the most important current trends and developments in the world of Directors’ and Officers’ liability and insurance. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:26 am
Barnhill, 212 A.3d 805 (Del. 2019), a well-known duty of oversight decision from the Supreme Court of Delaware. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 12:15 am
Barnhill, 212 A.3d 805 (Del. 2019) for bad faith: “Bad faith is established, under Caremark, when ‘the directors [completely] fail[ ] to implement any reporting or information system or controls[,] or . . . having implemented such a system or controls, consciously fail[ ] to monitor or oversee its operations thus disabling themselves from being informed of risks or problems requiring their attention. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:05 pm
Barnhill, the Delaware Supreme Court refused to dismiss a complaint against directors and officers for oversight failure in a food company that lead to a disastrous listeria outbreak – even though the operating company in the case was a limited partnership that was 69 percent owned by the holding company in which the plaintiffs held their shares. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:05 pm
Barnhill, 212 A.3d 805, 809 (Del. 2019). [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 12:55 pm
Barnhill, Delaware courts have sustained a number of breach of the duty of oversight claims. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 2:01 pm
In the latest development in the Delaware courts’ evolving elucidation of the standards surrounding claims for breach of the duty of oversight – sometimes referred to as Caremark claims — a Delaware Court has held that the board of McDonald’s cannot be held liable for an alleged oversight duty breach in connection with the alleged scandals at the company involving sexual harassment allegations. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
Barnhill, 212 A.3d 822 (2018). [2] See PWC 2021 Annual Corporate Directors Survey, The Director’s New Playbook: Taking on Change, at 6. [3] See In re Caremark Inc Derivative Litigation, 698 A.2d 959, 970 (Del. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
Barnhill, the Delaware Supreme Court held that the plaintiff had pled facts supporting a reasonable inference that the directors of an ice cream company had “consciously failed to attempt to assure a reasonable information and reporting system existed”[9] to enable directors to monitor the company’s compliance with food safety laws. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 8:40 am
Barnhill (Premises liability; negligence; motion for summary judgment). [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 11:29 am
In a shareholder claim against the former global head of HR at McDonald’s, the Delaware Chancery Court has held that liability for breach of the duty of oversight, which Delaware courts had previously extended only to corporate directors, can also extend to corporate officers, as well. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 2:44 pm
Arch Oboler was an American entertainer perhaps best known for running the 1930s radio drama Lights Out. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 7:34 am
Librarian Professor Butler also recommends When Women Were Dragons by Kelly Barnhill. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 1:47 pm
The directors’ and officers’ liability environment is always changing, but 2022 was a particularly eventful year, with important consequences for the D&O insurance marketplace. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 6:00 am
Barnhill – corporate directors who in bad faith fail to impose systems for monitoring important risks or fail to act in response to known “red flags” conceivably face monetary liability for breaching the fiduciary duty of loyalty. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 6:30 am
Barnhill decision, in which the Supreme Court, overturning the Court of Chancery, found that the defendant directors were potentially liable under Caremark. [read post]
