Search for: "Barocas v Barocas"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2016, 11:12 am
” 11We believe the civil union law created a burdensome and flawedstatutory scheme that fails to afford same-sex couples the samerights and remedies provided to heterosexual married couples asrequired … by the New Jersey Supreme Court and its landmarkLewis v. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 1:31 pm
The term “disparate impact” was first used in the 1971 Supreme Court case Griggs v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 4:42 am
The Court in Barocas v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:04 am
First Department Holds Although Husband Retained All the Property, Court Will Not Set Aside Agreement on Ground of Unconscionability Where Inequitable Conduct Lacking In Barocas v Barocas, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2012 WL 1293783 (N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.) the Appellate… [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 6:22 pm
That is one lesson to be learned from a split-decision of the Appellate Division First Department in its April 17, 2012 decision in Barocas v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 2:45 pm
Div. 1957), Innes v. [read post]