Search for: "Barr v. Clarke" Results 1 - 20 of 51
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm by Ryan Goodman
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:31 am by Norman L. Eisen
Attorney Barbara McQuade, who published a model prosecution memo over a year ago on which we build.[14] Most recently, the consensus has been joined by Trump’s own former attorney general and one-time defender, Bill Barr,[15] and eminent conservative jurist Judge Michael Luttig.[16] A series of rare convictions of some of the leading insurrectionists under the charge of seditious conspiracy have now laid the groundwork for closely related insurrection charges against Trump. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
And the privacy interests protected by that constitutional tort have been balanced against the public interest in freedom of expression at irish law in exactly the same way that they were balanced at all three levels in Bloomberg (here, the leading case is Cogley v RTÉ [2005] 4 IR 79, [2005] IEHC 180 (8 June 2005) (Clarke J); see also Herrity v Associated Newspapers [2009] 1 IR 316, [2008] IEHC 249 (18 July 2008)… [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
He was also involved in the effort to install as acting attorney general Jeffrey Clark, who backed plans to block Biden from taking office. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm by Norman L. Eisen
” The letter came more than one week after Barr had already told the press that there was zero evidence of significant fraud which could affect the outcome of the election. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 5:01 am by Stephen Halbrook
Barr (7th Cir. 2019) (Barrett, J., dissenting). [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 6:00 am by jonathanturley
” Later, Chief Justice John Marshall also was burned in effigy after writing the famous opinion in Marbury v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am by INFORRM
Irish constitutional law does indeed subscribe to a hierarchy of rights in some cases (see, eg, People (DPP) v Shaw [1982] IR 1, 63 (Kenny J)); but that is usually unprincipled and largely unworkable (see, eg, Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) [138]-[139] (McCarthy J), [184] (Egan J); Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March 2017) [36] (O’Donnell J)… [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 8:30 am by Tia Sewell, Anna Salvatore
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s Sept. 2 decision on United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
Data Protection Report has a comment on the decision of the US Supreme Court  in Barr v. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
New Zealand On 12 December 2019 Clark J handed down judgment in the defamation and privacy case of Driver v Radio New Zealand Limited [2019] NZHC 3275. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:52 am by William Ford
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit’s ruling in Davidson v. [read post]