Search for: "Barr v. Scott"
Results 1 - 20
of 79
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 6:56 am
” Powell also pointed to two cases, Barr v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:31 am
Attorney Barbara McQuade, who published a model prosecution memo over a year ago on which we build.[14] Most recently, the consensus has been joined by Trump’s own former attorney general and one-time defender, Bill Barr,[15] and eminent conservative jurist Judge Michael Luttig.[16] A series of rare convictions of some of the leading insurrectionists under the charge of seditious conspiracy have now laid the groundwork for closely related insurrection charges against Trump. [read post]
5 May 2023, 9:40 am
According to the SEC in the challenged order, the claimants are entitled to an award based only on what the SEC actually collected prior to the bankruptcy (Barr v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:45 am
There is little doubt that Dominion’s suit for damages met and indeed exceeded the standard the Supreme Court established in 1964 in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
Scott Perry is asking an appeals court to block a search of his cellphone by the special counsel investigating the insurrection at the Capitol. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm
Scott Perry (R-Penn.) is protected by the Speech or Debate Clause from the Jan. 6 criminal investigation. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Dred Scott v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 2:32 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in NetChoice v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:06 am
The Justice Department’s current investigation of criminal efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election apparently is taking two paths. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
The Bradford Hill Predicate: Ruling Out Random and Systematic Error In two recent posts, I spent some time discussing a recent law review, which had some important things to say about specific causation.[1] One of several points from which I dissented was the article’s argument that Sir Austin Bradford Hill had not made explicit that ruling out random and systematic error was required before assessing his nine “viewpoints” on whether an association was causal. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
[Editor’s Note: This post is based on a comment letter submitted to the U.S. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Palin v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 5:57 am
Lund (University of Southern California), on Tuesday, January 11, 2022 Tags: Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 11:22 am
After the hearing, another Republican, Representative Scott Lipps, blamed Gross for having invited Tenpenny. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 3:02 am
Barr v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm
” Greene labels a few of the most odious Supreme Court decisions—Dred Scott v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 7:41 pm
Barr. [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 7:52 am
Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast in which Benjamin Wittes sat down with Scott R. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 1:01 pm
” Benjamin Wittes sat down with Scott R. [read post]
